Modeling the characteristics of collaborative science and technology policy network

被引:1
|
作者
Kalantari, Esmaeel [1 ]
Montazer, Gholamali [2 ]
Ghazinoory, Sepehr [1 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Management & Econ, Tehran, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Ind & Syst Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Collaborative policy networks (CPNs); science and technology policy; confirmatory factor analysis; Structural equation modeling (SEM); Iran;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2021.1908537
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite the growing trend of networking approaches in policymaking, the concept of collaborative policy networks (CPNs) and, in particular, the identification of their characteristics, remain a serious research vacuum. Thus, the main purpose of this study is to provide a model for identifying the characteristics of CPNs. For this purpose, the science and technology policy network in Iran was studied on a case-by-case basis. In this study, the theoretical framework of research was formulated as a sequential exploratory mixed design by first using literature review, policy documents analysis and in-depth interviews with 20 experts. Then, a survey was conducted by distributing a questionnaire among 100 science and technology policy experts and scholars in Iran. Data analysis was performed through confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation analysis method and, subsequently, the final research model was developed. The final model of CPNs consists of 17 characteristics in four dimensions of 'actors', 'relationships among actors', 'structure' and 'the rules of conduct between actors'. Thus, the presence of such characteristics in the policy networks can lead to increased participation of actors and, of course, the effectiveness of policies.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 517
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges of Social Cognitive Network Science: Network Science Collaborative Technology Alliance Perspective
    Cosenzo, Keryl Ann
    Szymanski, Boleslaw Karol
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL NETWORK SCIENCE WORKSHOP (NSW), 2013, : 122 - 125
  • [2] Mapping of a science and technology policy network based on social network analysis
    Kalantari, Esmaeel
    Montazer, Gholamali
    Ghazinoory, Sepehr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION, 2021, 17 (03) : 115 - 147
  • [3] Network Perspective of Science and Technology Policy Research Community in Taiwan
    Su, Hsin-Ning
    Lee, Pei-Chun
    [J]. PICMET 2010: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2010,
  • [4] Science and Technology Policy
    Baba, Toshio
    [J]. IEEE NANOTECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2011, 5 (04) : 4 - 9
  • [5] SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
    ABELSON, PH
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1995, 267 (5197) : 435 - 435
  • [6] SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
    ABELSON, PH
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1990, 248 (4954) : 421 - 421
  • [7] Science policy vs technology policy?
    Szanto, B
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 1996, 16 (08) : 411 - 420
  • [8] Lessons for science and technology policy? Probing the Linkedin network of an RDI organisation
    Evi Sachini
    Konstantinos Sioumalas-⁠ Christodoulou
    Nikias Bouras
    Nikolaos Karampekios
    [J]. SN Social Sciences, 2 (12):
  • [9] Linking multiple stressor science to policy opportunities through network modeling
    Wedding, L. M.
    Green, S. J.
    Reiter, S.
    Arrigo, K. R.
    Hazen, L.
    Ruckelshaus, M.
    van der Grient, J. M. A.
    Bailey, R. M.
    Cameron, M. A.
    Leape, J.
    Levi, M.
    Merkl, A.
    Mills, M. M.
    Monismith, S.
    Ouellette, N. T.
    van Dijken, G.
    Micheli, F.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2022, 146
  • [10] Research on the technology of product modeling for network-based collaborative product development
    Zhao, M
    Lin, LF
    Gao, P
    Lou, YC
    Cai, M
    [J]. THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ENGINEERING: DIGITAL ENTERPRISES AND NONTRADITIONAL INDUSTRIALIZATION, 2003, : 217 - 219