Design it yourself (DIY): in-house instructional design for online pharmacology

被引:3
|
作者
Loftus, Jay [1 ]
Stavraky, Tom [2 ]
Urquhart, Bradley L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
关键词
Online learning; Instructional design; Undergraduate pharmacology; Nursing education; Basic health sciences education; Curriculum development; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; COGNITIVE LOAD; PRINCIPLES; EDUCATION; ABILITY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-013-9492-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Demand for e-learning courses has risen dramatically placing pressure on institutions to offer more online courses. Third party vendors now offer courses that can be embedded directly into learning management systems. When transitioning from in-class to e-learning formats, instructors must decide whether to use commercially available courses or design in-house. The objective of this study was to evaluate our transition from delivering introductory pharmacology via a purchased e-pack to an in-house designed course. A team that included an instructional designer, an education specialist and a content expert created an online course in pharmacology. Merrill's first principles of instruction were used as a guide for the design of our online course. Where appropriate, multiple forms of media were introduced to reinforce concepts. We compared grades and design strategy from a previous iteration that was delivered using a commercially available e-pack. A cost analysis was conducted to determine the institutional setup and maintenance costs of in-house course design. The mean final grade from the in-house designed course was 81.9 (0.5) % compared to 76.4 (0.5) % for the e-pack course (P < 0.001). Course evaluations were significantly improved for the in-house course compared to the e-pack. Cost-analysis demonstrated that designing a course in-house has a high initial cost ($111,180.57) but can be maintained with minimal institutional cost ($500) in future offerings. Our results demonstrate that effective courses can be designed in-house and this should be a viable option for institutions that have appropriate resources to support instructional design.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 659
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design it yourself (DIY): in-house instructional design for online pharmacology
    Jay Loftus
    Tom Stavraky
    Bradley L. Urquhart
    [J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2014, 19 : 645 - 659
  • [2] DO-IT-YOURSELF DESIGN + IN-HOUSE PUBLICATIONS
    FERGUSON, MD
    [J]. MUSEUM NEWS, 1978, 56 (04): : 38 - 41
  • [3] DIY (Design It Yourself) Orthodontics
    Cobourne, Martyn T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 44 (06) : 723 - 723
  • [4] IN-HOUSE GATE ARRAY DESIGN
    CARLSTEDTDUKE, T
    [J]. ELECTRONICS & WIRELESS WORLD, 1988, 94 (1628): : 608 - 608
  • [5] DIY: Developing Web applications in-house
    Engard, Nicole C.
    [J]. ONLINE, 2006, 30 (06): : 35 - 38
  • [6] DIY: Developing Web applications in-house
    Engard, Nicole
    [J]. Online (Wilton, Connecticut), 2006, 30 (06): : 35 - 38
  • [7] IN-HOUSE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SCADA SYSTEM
    CEROTSKY, K
    ARRERA, C
    [J]. WATER-ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 1989, 136 (11): : 28 - +
  • [8] BRINGING SEMICUSTOM IC DESIGN IN-HOUSE
    VANCLEEMPUT, WM
    [J]. COMPUTER DESIGN, 1983, 22 (02): : 185 - &
  • [9] Design of Public Projects: Outsource or In-House?
    Griffis, F. H.
    Choi, Hyunchul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 29 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [10] CASE FOR IN-HOUSE CONTROL GEAR DESIGN
    ELIAS, TG
    [J]. ELECTRICAL REVIEW, 1975, 197 (03): : 84 - 85