Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy - Reply

被引:0
|
作者
Labib, M [1 ]
Palfrey, S
Paniagua, E
Callender, R
机构
[1] Russells Hall Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[2] Wordsley Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Stourbridge, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1177/000456329803500131
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Dr Al-Jubouri's assumption, that laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) already has a clinically proven reputation for being minimally invasive with less morbidity, is scientifically unfounded. Despite the shorter hospital stay, the laparoscopic procedure takes, on average, 35min and 70min longer in operation time than abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy, respectively, and is associated with more intra-operative complications (6%) compared to either abdominal (4%) or vaginal hysterectomy (2%).(1) A prospective, randomized trial found no differences between LAVH and the traditional vaginal approach with regard to estimated blood loss and operative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stays and periods of convalescence.(2) Another recent study showed that complications related to haemorrhage or the accidental laceration of blood vessels, nerves or organs were most common with the laparoscopic procedure.(3) In fact, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy has generated more controversy than any other laparoscopic procedure and, based on current knowledge, its benefits remain uncertain.(4,5) Dr Al-Jubouri's suggestion that a comparison of the postoperative inflammatory response to a single surgical procedure performed by various surgeons might be more fruitful to future patients, as they may wish to choose their surgeon, is somewhat naive. First, patients are generally referred to specialists for a clinical opinion and not for a specific procedure. Secondly, the choice of which procedure to use can only be made by the surgeon to whom the patient has been referred, and is based on clinical criteria. Moreover, 12% of LAVH procedures are converted to open laparotomy during operation.(1) Concerning Dr Al-Jubouri's final statement, we believe that researchers and scientists in particular should not rely simply on their common sense, but on objective and scientific evidence.(6) Based on current knowledge, the overall benefits of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy remain uncertain and we believe that our findings provide, for the first time, some objective and scientific evidence that may help in resolving the controversy surrounding this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 157
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LAPAROSCOPIC VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY - REPLY
    AULD, BJ
    RAJU, KS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (06): : 511 - 512
  • [2] Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy
    Al-Jubouri, MA
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 35 : 156 - 156
  • [3] Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer
    Frigerio, L
    Gallo, A
    Ghezzi, F
    Trezzi, G
    Lussana, M
    Franchi, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 93 (03) : 209 - 213
  • [4] Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
    Song, Xue
    Waters, Heidi C.
    Pan, Katy
    Subramanian, Dhinagar
    Sedgley, Robert C.
    Raff, Gregory J.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2011, 15 (04) : 460 - 470
  • [5] LAPAROSCOPIC SUPRACERVICAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    RICHARDS, SR
    SIMPKINS, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1995, 2 (04): : 431 - 435
  • [6] Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
    El-Mowafi, D
    Madkour, W
    Lall, C
    Wenger, JM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (02): : 175 - 180
  • [7] Converting Potential Abdominal Hysterectomy to Vaginal One: Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
    Shetty, Jyothi
    Shanbhag, Asha
    Pandey, Deeksha
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2014, 2014
  • [8] Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy
    Shiota, M.
    Kotani, Y.
    Umemoto, M.
    Tobiume, T.
    Shimaoka, M.
    Hoshiai, H.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2011, 4 (04) : 161 - 165
  • [9] The postoperative inflammatory response to injury following laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy
    Labib, M
    Palfrey, S
    Paniagua, E
    Callender, R
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1997, 34 : 543 - 545
  • [10] Comparison between laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and abdominal hysterectomy
    Kunz, G
    Plath, T
    Leyendecker, G
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1996, 56 (09) : 453 - 457