Toward creating a fairer ranking in search engine results

被引:66
|
作者
Gao, Ruoyuan [1 ]
Shah, Chirag [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Informat Sch, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Information retrieval; Search engine bias; Fairness ranking; Relevance; Diversity; Novelty; BIAS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102138
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the increasing popularity and social influence of search engines in IR, various studies have raised concerns on the presence of bias in search engines and the social responsibilities of IR systems. As an essential component of search engine, ranking is a crucial mechanism in presenting the search results or recommending items in a fair fashion. In this article, we focus on the top-k diversity fairness ranking in terms of statistical parity fairness and disparate impact fairness. The former fairness definition provides a balanced overview of search results where the number of documents from different groups are equal; The latter enables a realistic overview where the proportion of documents from different groups reflect the overall proportion. Using 100 queries and top 100 results per query from Google as the data, we first demonstrate how topical diversity bias is present in the top web search results. Then, with our proposed entropy-based metrics for measuring the degree of bias, we reveal that the top search results are unbalanced and disproportionate to their overall diversity distribution. We explore several fairness ranking strategies to investigate the relationship between fairness, diversity, novelty and relevance. Our experimental results show that using a variant of fair epsilon-greedy strategy, we could bring more fairness and enhance diversity in search results without a cost of relevance. In fact, we can improve the relevance and diversity by introducing the diversity fairness. Additional experiments with TREC datasets containing 50 queries demonstrate the robustness of our proposed strategies and our findings on the impact of fairness. We present a series of correlation analysis on the amount of fairness and diversity, showing that statistical parity fairness highly correlates with diversity while disparate impact fairness does not. This provides clear and tangible implications for future works where one would want to balance fairness, diversity and relevance in search results.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Temporal ranking of search engine results
    Jatowt, A
    Kawai, Y
    Tanaka, K
    WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING - WISE 2005, 2005, 3806 : 43 - 52
  • [2] RANKING CLASSES OF SEARCH ENGINE RESULTS
    Zhu, Zheng
    Levene, Mark
    Cox, Ingemar
    KDIR 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2010, : 294 - 301
  • [3] SearchRank : A Method Of Ranking Results For Search Engine
    Qi, Cong
    AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [4] GeoSearcher: GeoSpatial ranking of search engine results
    Watters, C
    Amoudi, G
    ASIST 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 65TH ASIST ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 39, 2002, 2002, 39 : 409 - 416
  • [5] GeoSearcher: Location-based ranking of search engine results
    Watters, C
    Amoudi, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (02): : 140 - 151
  • [6] A study on search engine ranking factors - An example of google search engine
    Lin, Lily
    Tsao, Shuang-Kai
    Lee, Huey-Ming
    ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 2016, 7 (09): : 2029 - 2034
  • [7] Coverage, relevance, and ranking: The impact of query operators on web search engine results
    Eastman, CM
    Jansen, BJ
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 21 (04) : 383 - 411
  • [8] Personalized Accessibility based Re-ranking of Search Engine Results (PARSER)
    Kuppusamy, K. S.
    Balaji, V.
    Balamurugan, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND CONTROL (ISCO'16), 2016,
  • [9] Relevance ranking is not relevance ranking or, when the user is not the user, the search results are not search results
    Bade, David
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2007, 31 (06) : 831 - 844
  • [10] Fairer candidates search engine? Degendering recommendations using smarter algorithms
    Kubiak, Emeric
    Coeurdoux, Florentin
    Baron, Simon
    Faurie, Jianqiu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OPEN, 2023, 82 : 254 - 254