A Pilot Safety and Tolerability Study of a Nonhormonal Vaginal Contraceptive Ring

被引:0
|
作者
Del Priore, Giuseppe
Malanowska-Stega, Jeanetta
Shalaby, W. Shalaby
Richman, Susan
机构
[1] NY Downtown, Res Dept, New York, NY USA
[2] Poly Med Inc, Anderson, SC USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
barrier contraception; Ovaprene; postcoital testing; HUMAN SPERM; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; POSTCOITAL TEST; NONOXYNOL-9; ACIDFORM; VALIDITY; GEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot safety and tolerability study of the Ovaprene ring (Poly-Med Inc., Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina) as a barrier contraceptive. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, single-arm, observational study in a convenient sample of volunteers. Women meeting inclusion criteria and using another contraceptive method were instructed in proper insertion of the ring at the completion of their menses, with removal at their subsequent menses or 29 days. Baseline Pap smears, vaginal cultures and colposcopy were performed, with follow-up postcoital testing and acceptability questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty women enrolled; all completed one cycle of use. Rings were inserted properly and retained in place (range, 5-29 days). Patient questionnaires revealed no pain or bleeding, and no colposcopic abnormalities were seen. Semiquantitative cultures yielded no significant changes in vaginal flora. Postcoital testing revealed nonviable sperm (motile/total, mean count/10 high power fields) 2/>20 in the vaginal pool and 0/0 in cervical mucus. There were no serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The Ovaprene device is well tolerated and acceptable to sexually active women anti their partners. (J Reprod Med 2009; 54:685-690)
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 690
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A pilot safety and tolerability study of a nonhormonal vaginal contraceptive ring
    Del Priore, Giuseppe
    Stega, Jeanetta
    Richman, Susan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 64S - 65S
  • [2] A pilot safety and tolerability study of a non-hormonal vaginal contraceptive ring.
    Del Priore, G.
    Stega, J.
    Richman, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S257 - S257
  • [3] Safety testing of Ovaprene: An investigational nonhormonal monthly vaginal contraceptive
    Mauck, Christine
    Thurman, Andrea
    Jensen, Jeffrey T.
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Baker, Jeff
    Hou, Melody Y.
    Chavoustie, Steven
    Dart, Clint
    Wu, Hongsheng
    Ravel, Jacques
    Gajer, Pawel
    Herold, Betsy C.
    Jacot, Terry
    Zack, Nadene
    Hatheway, Jessica
    Friend, David
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 135
  • [4] Contraceptive efficacy and tolerability with a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing
    Roumen, F
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2002, 7 : 19 - 24
  • [5] Safety of nonhormonal vaginal lubricants and moisturizers
    O'Brien, Devon
    Balica, Adrian
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2017, 24 (12): : 1445 - 1445
  • [6] A Comparative Study on the Contraception Efficacy and Safety of the Progesterone Releasing Contraceptive Vaginal Ring and the
    杜明昆
    郑怀美
    郑苏华
    陈帼君
    Reproduction & Contraception, 1996, (01) : 40 - 47
  • [7] Vaginal contraceptive ring
    Patterson, L
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2006, 32 (02): : 138 - 138
  • [8] The Contraceptive Vaginal Ring
    Edwardson, Jill
    Jamshidi, Roxanne
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 28 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [9] Contraceptive vaginal ring
    Madden, Tessa
    Blumenthal, Paul
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 50 (04): : 878 - 885
  • [10] Acceptability, tolerability, and satisfaction of a contraceptive vaginal ring (the NuvaRing) among Thai women
    Santibenchakul, Somsook
    Jaisamrarn, Unnop
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 10 (03) : 235 - 241