Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk pediatric spine surgery: Is cefazolin enough?

被引:4
|
作者
Piantoni, Lucas [1 ]
Tello, Carlos A. [1 ]
Remondino, Rodrigo G. [1 ]
Wilson, Ida A. Francheri [1 ]
Galaretto, Eduardo [1 ]
Bersusky, Ernesto S. [1 ]
Noel, Mariano A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Pediat Prof Dr Juan P Garrahan, Serv Patol Espinal, Combate Pozos 1881 C1245 AAM, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Spine deformity surgery; Anti-biotic prophylaxis; Pediatric spine; Cefazoline; High risk patient; Surgical site infection; SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; DEEP WOUND INFECTIONS; SCOLIOSIS SURGERY; FUSION; PREVENTION; MICROBIOLOGY; CHILDREN; RATES;
D O I
10.1007/s43390-020-00092-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study designRetrospective study.ObjectiveTo describe pathogens found in SSI during pediatric-instrumented spine surgery, and to assess the relationship between pathogens and the etiology of the spinal deformity.Summary and background dataSurgical site infection (SSI) after pediatric spine fusion is a well-known complication with incidence rates between 0.5 and 42%, associated with the patient underlying disorder. Pathogens involved in SSI seem to be related to patient characteristics, such as the etiology of the spinal deformity. GNB (gram-negative bacilli) are more frequent in neuropathic, muscular, and syndromic conditions. High-risk pediatric patients with a spine deformity undergoing instrumented surgery might benefit from receiving perioperative intravenous prophylaxis for GNB.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study at our tertiary-care pediatric hospital from January 2010 to January 2017. We reviewed records of all episodes of SSI that occurred in the first 12 months postoperatively. All patients who underwent instrumented spine surgery were included in this study.ResultsWe assessed 1410 pediatric-instrumented spine surgeries; we identified 68 patients with deep SSIs, overall rate of 4.8%. Mean age at instrumented spine surgery was 12 years and 9 months. Time elapsed between instrumented surgery and debridement surgery was 28.8 days. Cultures were positive in 48 and negative in 20. Of the 48 positive culture results, 41 (72%) were GNB, 12 (21%) gram-positive cocci (GPC), three (5%) gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC), and one (2%) coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Of the 68 patients with primary SSIs, 46 were considered to have a high risk of infection, which reported GNB in 81%, GPC in 15%, GPAC in 2%, and CoNS in 2%.ConclusionCefazolin prophylaxis covers GPC and CoNS, but GNB with unreliable effectiveness. Gram-negative pathogens are increasingly reported in SSIs in high-risk patients. Adding prophylaxis for GNB in high-risk patients should be taken into account when considering spine surgery.Level of evidenceIV.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 676
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk pediatric spine surgery: Is cefazolin enough?
    Lucas Piantoni
    Carlos A. Tello
    Rodrigo G. Remondino
    Ida A. Francheri Wilson
    Eduardo Galaretto
    Ernesto S. Bersusky
    Mariano A. Noel
    Spine Deformity, 2020, 8 : 669 - 676
  • [2] ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS OF INFECTIONS FOR SURGERY ON THE HIGH-RISK PATIENT
    LODE, H
    SCHABERG, T
    HOFFKEN, G
    INTERNIST, 1992, 33 (06): : 418 - 424
  • [3] Cefazolin prophylaxis in spine surgery: patients are frequently underdosed and at increased risk for infection
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Siegel, Nicholas
    Sherman, Matthew
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (09): : 1442 - 1450
  • [4] IDENTIFICATION AND ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS OF HIGH-RISK PATIENTS IN ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY
    TORNQVIST, A
    FORSGREN, A
    LEANDOER, L
    URSING, J
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 11 (01) : 115 - 119
  • [5] Antibiotic prophylaxis in cervical spine surgery
    不详
    INFECTION, 2005, 33 (03) : 199 - 200
  • [6] Standardizing Care for High-Risk Patients in Spine Surgery The Northwestern High-Risk Spine Protocol
    Halpin, Ryan J.
    Sugrue, Patrick A.
    Gould, Robert W.
    Kallas, Peter G.
    Schafer, Michael F.
    Ondra, Stephen L.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (25) : 2232 - 2238
  • [7] IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-RISK PATIENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY
    TORNQVIST, A
    FORSGREN, A
    LEANDOER, L
    URSING, J
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1986, 31 (10) : S21 - S21
  • [8] Cardiac surgery in a high-risk group of patients: Is prolonged postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis effective?
    Niederhauser, U
    Vogt, M
    Vogt, P
    Genoni, M
    Kunzli, A
    Turina, MI
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 114 (02): : 162 - 168
  • [9] ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN GENITOURINARY SURGERY - A COMPARISON OF CEFOTAXIME AND CEFAZOLIN
    CHILDS, SJ
    WOOD, PD
    KOSOLA, JW
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1982, 5 : 48 - 57
  • [10] CEFOTAXIME IN HIGH-RISK BILIARY AND GASTRODUODENAL SURGERY - A CONTROLLED TRIAL ON DURATION OF ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS
    NIELSEN, ML
    MOESGAARD, F
    HJORTRUP, A
    KIERSGAARD, P
    CHRISTOPHERSEN, S
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1986, 31 (10) : S26 - S26