The kinetic friction of polyethylen on snow, comparison between laboratory and field measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Buhl, D [1 ]
Fauve, M [1 ]
Rhyner, H [1 ]
机构
[1] SFISAR, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Experiments were done in the freezing chamber with polyethylen specimens sliding on ice using a tribometer. The coefficient of friction was measured as a function of the surrounding temperature (varyied between -25 degrees C and 0 degrees C) and the pressure on the slider (varyied between 50 MPa and 300 Mpa). The coefficient of friction is strongly depending on the temperature of the ice surface. It is on its minimum around -3 degrees C. In the temperature range between -3 degrees C and 0 degrees C the coefficient of friction is increasing with increasing temperature. In the temperature range between -3 degrees C and -25 degrees C the coefficient of friction is increasing with decreasing temperature. In the low temperature range the coefficient of friction is depending on the pressure on the slider. The higher the pressure, the lower is the coefficient of friction. The influence of the pressure is decreasing for an increasing temperature and above -6 degrees C there is no difference visible between different loads anymore. The temperature of the ice surface is higher than the surrounding temperature. Especially for low temperatures the temperature of the ice surface is significantly increased by frictional heating. The results correspond well to the idea of three different components forming the overall kinetic friction. At low temperatures dry friction dominates, whereas with increasing temperature a more lubricated friction decreases the coefficient of friction and for even higher temperatures capillary drag effects increase the friction again. The results are confirmed by extended field measurements of gliding with skis on snow under racing conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 44
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The kinetic friction of polyethylen on snow: the influence of the snow temperature and the load
    Buhl, D
    Fauve, M
    Rhyner, H
    COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 33 (2-3) : 133 - 140
  • [2] KINETIC FRICTION BETWEEN SKI AND SNOW
    LEHTOVAARA, A
    ACTA POLYTECHNICA SCANDINAVICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SERIES, 1989, (93): : 1 - 52
  • [3] Comparison Between Laboratory and Field Stiffness by Wave Measurements
    Martins, Joao
    Gomes Correia, A.
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2015, 43 (02) : 452 - 464
  • [4] THE KINETIC FRICTION OF SNOW
    COLBECK, SC
    JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 1988, 34 (116) : 78 - 86
  • [5] Backscattering from snow and ice:: Laboratory and field measurements
    Kaasalainen, S
    Karttunen, H
    Piironen, J
    Virtanen, J
    Liljeström, A
    Näränen, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2003, 81 (1-2) : 135 - 143
  • [6] FIELD AND LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF SNOW LIQUID WATER BY DILUTION
    DAVIS, RE
    DOZIER, J
    LACHAPELLE, ER
    PERLA, R
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1985, 21 (09) : 1415 - 1420
  • [7] CCP - Correlation current profiler a comparison between laboratory and field measurements
    van Unen, RF
    van Beuzekom, AA
    ten Brinke, WBM
    Cox, HLH
    OCEANS'98 - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 1807 - 1811
  • [8] Kinetic Friction of Sport Fabrics on Snow
    Nachbauer, Werner
    Moessner, Martin
    Rohm, Sebastian
    Schindelwig, Kurt
    Hasler, Michael
    LUBRICANTS, 2016, 4 (01):
  • [9] Numerical modelling of sublimation on snow and comparison with field measurements
    Hachikubo, A
    ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY, VOL 32, 2001, 2001, 32 : 27 - 32
  • [10] Field and laboratory measurements of sediment erodibility: A comparison
    Schaaff, E
    Grenz, C
    Pinazo, C
    Lansard, B
    JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2006, 55 (01) : 30 - 42