Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients

被引:111
|
作者
McLachlan, SA
Devins, GM
Goodwin, PJ
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Oncol, Fitzroy, Vic 3065, Australia
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto Hosp, Clarke Inst Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[3] Mt Sinai Hosp, Samuel Lunenfeld Res Dept, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Marvelle Koffler Breast Ctr, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Care Program, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
quality of life; breast neoplasms; questionnaires; health status;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(97)10076-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 has been developed as a quantitative measure of health-related quality of life for use in clinical trials of cancer patients. Validity is an important measurement property of all scientific tests. This study contributes to the iterative process of validating the questionnaire by focusing on the psychosocial subscales of the QLQ-C30, using baseline data from 150 patients participating in a randomised trial of supportive group therapy for metastatic breast cancer. The results provide strong support for the discriminative validity of the global health/quality of life, role function and social function subscales of the QLQ-C30, in patients differing according to clinical criteria. The psychosocial focus of the trial enabled expansion of criteria used to form patient subgroups, beyond medical factors, and consequently support was demonstrated for the discriminative validity of the emotional and cognitive function subscales. The degree of support for these subscales was less substantial than for the other QLQ-C30 subscales as there were fewer relevant criteria. Convergence assessed by correlations with independent measures of psychosocial function provides strong support for the convergent validity of the emotional function, role function and global health/quality of life subscales of the QLQ-C30, and moderate support for the social function subscales. There was little opportunity for the cognitive function subscale to associate with conceptually analagous subscales. Further testing is recommended with more comprehensive and specific measures of cognitive status. In general, the psychosocial subscales of the QLQ-C30 appear to be measuring the concepts they are purported to measure. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 517
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation study of the Thai version
    Silpakit, C
    Sirilerttrakul, S
    Jirajarus, M
    Sirisinha, T
    Sirachainan, E
    Ratanatharathorn, V
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [2] The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation of English version in Singapore
    Luo, N
    Fones, CSL
    Lim, SE
    Xie, F
    Thumboo, J
    Li, SC
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (04) : 1181 - 1186
  • [3] The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation of English version in Singapore
    N. Luo
    C. S. L. Fones
    S. E. Lim
    F. Xie
    J. Thumboo
    S. C. Li
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14 : 1181 - 1186
  • [4] The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation Study of the Thai Version
    Chatchawan Silpakit
    Suwanee Sirilerttrakul
    Manmana Jirajarus
    Thitiya Sirisinha
    Ekaphop Sirachainan
    Vorachai Ratanatharathorn
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2006, 15 : 167 - 172
  • [5] The European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation of English version in Singapore
    Xie, F
    Luo, N
    Li, SC
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (03) : 252 - 252
  • [6] The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): translation and validation study of the Iranian version
    Montazeri, A
    Harirchi, I
    Vahdani, M
    Khaleghi, F
    Jarvandi, S
    Ebrahimi, M
    Haji-Mahmoodi, M
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1999, 7 (06) : 400 - 406
  • [7] The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): translation and validation study of the Iranian version
    A. Montazeri
    Iraj Harirchi
    Mariam Vahdani
    Fatemeh Khaleghi
    Soghra Jarvandi
    Mandana Ebrahimi
    Mehregan Haji-Mahmoodi
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 1999, 7 : 400 - 406
  • [8] A cross-validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer
    Kobayashi, K
    Takeda, F
    Teramukai, S
    Gotoh, I
    Sakai, H
    Yoneda, S
    Noguchi, Y
    Ogasawara, H
    Yoshida, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (06) : 810 - 815
  • [9] Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    Calderon, Caterina
    Ferrando, Pere J.
    Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano
    Ferreira, Estrella
    Lee, Eun Mi
    Oporto-Alonso, Marta
    Obispo-Portero, Berta M.
    Mihic-Gongora, Luka
    Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Adan
    Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (06) : 1859 - 1869
  • [10] Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
    Caterina Calderon
    Pere J. Ferrando
    Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
    Estrella Ferreira
    Eun Mi Lee
    Marta Oporto-Alonso
    Berta M. Obispo-Portero
    Luka Mihic-Góngora
    Adan Rodríguez-González
    Paula Jiménez-Fonseca
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2022, 31 : 1859 - 1869