WAR MAY NOT BE IN OUR NATURE AFTER ALL WHY WE FIGHT

被引:4
|
作者
Ferguson, R. Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Univ Newark, Anthropol, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/scientificamerican0918-76
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
DO PEOPLE, OR PERHAPS JUST MALES, HAVE AN EVOLVED PREDISPOSITION to kill members of other groups? Not just a capacity to kill but an innate propensity to take up arms, tilting us toward collective violence? The word "collective" is key. People fight and kill for personal reasons, but homicide is not war. War is social, with groups organized to kill people from other groups. Today controversy over the historical roots of warfare revolves around two polar positions. In one, war is an evolved propensity to eliminate any potential competitors. In this scenario, humans all the way back to our common ancestors with chimp-anzees have always made war. The other position holds that armed conflict has only emerged over recent millennia, as changing social conditions provided the motivation and organization to collectively kill. The two sides separate into what the late anthropologist Keith Otterbein called hawks and doves. (This debate also ties into the question of whether instinctive, warlike tendencies can be detected in chimpanzees [see box on page 80].)
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 81
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条