Evaluation of mulberry germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew in the field and greenhouse

被引:16
|
作者
Chattopadhyay, Soumen [1 ]
Ali, Kabiul Akhter [1 ]
Doss, S. Gandhi [1 ]
Das, Nirvan K. [1 ]
Aggarwal, Ramesh K. [2 ]
Bandopadhyay, Tapas K. [3 ]
Sarkar, A. [1 ]
Bajpai, A. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Silk Board, Cent Sericultural Res & Training Inst, Berhampur 742101, India
[2] Ctr Cellular & Mol Biol, Hyderabad 500007, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Univ Kalyani, Dept Mol Biol & Biotechnol, Kalyani 741235, W Bengal, India
关键词
Mulberry; Powdery mildew; Phyllactinia guttata; Multi-parametric evaluation; Resistant source; Natural and artificial epiphytotics; ADULT-PLANT RESISTANCE; COWPEA GENOTYPES; ERYSIPHE-PISI; INHERITANCE; WILD; HYBRIDS; HORDEI; WHEAT; QTL;
D O I
10.1007/s10327-010-0221-x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Powdery mildew caused by the ascomycete Phyllactinia guttata (syn. P. corylea) is a major foliar disease worldwide of the unique mulberry (Morus spp.) for silkworm feed. Genetic resistance to powdery mildew, the most sustainable and economical strategy for disease control, is still elusive for tropical mulberry. About 147 germplasm sources, representing 18 countries of origin, were screened for resistance to P. guttata in six seasonal fields and greenhouse trials after exposure to natural and artificial inoculum, respectively. In the field, the level of plant responsiveness to disease was assessed from 30 to 62 days after pruning in each season as variations in the disease severity index (DSI), disease incidence (DI%) and area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). These measures differed significantly among the germplasm. Of 147 germplasm sources, similar to 6.8% had useful resistance (two high and nine moderately resistant) to the powdery mildew pathogen on the basis of DSI. The AUDPC values were 13.5-fold higher in the most susceptible accession-(Philippines) than the least responsive (Vietnam-2). The results of DSI were strongly correlated with the obtained DI values (r = 0.92; P < 0.01) and AUDPC (r = 0.89; P < 0.01). Moreover, field screening results were highly correlated (R (2) = 0.839) with values from the greenhouse evaluation using artificial inoculum. However, the DSI values in field and greenhouse screenings for three sources (Non-nayapati, Nao-khurkul and Tista Valley) varied significantly. A relatively low disease reaction of 09 resources (Vietnam-2, Ankara and 07 others) using different assessment scales after natural and artificial inoculation prove, for the first time, that they have potential in breeding for resistance in tropical mulberry to powdery mildew.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of mulberry germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew in the field and greenhouse
    Soumen Chattopadhyay
    Kabiul Akhter Ali
    S. Gandhi Doss
    Nirvan K. Das
    Ramesh K. Aggarwal
    Tapas K. Bandopadhyay
    A. Sarkar
    A. K. Bajpai
    Journal of General Plant Pathology, 2010, 76 : 87 - 93
  • [2] EVALUATION OF MALUS GERMPLASM FOR RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW
    KORBAN, SS
    DAYTON, DF
    HORTSCIENCE, 1983, 18 (02) : 219 - 220
  • [3] Evaluation of Cucurbita Pepo Germplasm for Resistance to Powdery Mildew
    Sabharwal, Prerna
    Smart, Christine D.
    Indermaur, Libby
    Day, Charles Thomas
    Mazourek, Michael R.
    Inzinna, Gregory P.
    Hausbeck, Mary
    Medina-Mora, Carmen
    Meru, Geoffrey
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (09) : S210 - S210
  • [4] Powdery mildew resistance in Pyrus germplasm
    Serdani, M
    Spotts, RA
    Calabro, JM
    Postman, JD
    Proceedings of the 9th International Pear Symposium, 2005, (671): : 609 - 613
  • [5] Evaluation of Genus Rosa Germplasm for Resistance to Black Spot, Downy Mildew and Powdery Mildew
    Schulz, D. F.
    Linde, M.
    Blechert, O.
    Debener, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2009, 74 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [6] Screening of pea germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew
    Rana, J. C.
    Banyal, D. K.
    Sharma, K. D.
    Sharma, Manish K.
    Gupta, S. K.
    Yadav, Satish K.
    EUPHYTICA, 2013, 189 (02) : 271 - 282
  • [7] Screening of pea germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew
    J. C. Rana
    D. K. Banyal
    K. D. Sharma
    Manish K. Sharma
    S. K. Gupta
    Satish K. Yadav
    Euphytica, 2013, 189 : 271 - 282
  • [8] SCREENING OF CITRUS GERMPLASM FOR RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW
    REDDY, MRS
    NAIDU, PH
    RAJU, DG
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1984, 53 (21): : 1163 - 1164
  • [9] Screening field pea germplasm for resistance to downy mildew (Peronospora viciae) and powdery mildew (Erysiphepisi)
    J. A. Davidson
    M. Krysinska-Kaczmarek
    R. B. E. Kimber
    M. D. Ramsey
    Australasian Plant Pathology, 2004, 33 : 413 - 417
  • [10] Evaluation of components of resistance to powdery mildew in field pea
    Xue, AG
    Dyck, BS
    Warkentin, TD
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2004, 84 (04) : 1183 - 1187