An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network

被引:122
|
作者
Han, Z. Y. [1 ]
Weng, W. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Engn Phys, Ctr Publ Safety Res, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Risk analysis; Quantitative evaluation; Natural gas pipeline; Safety management; HIGH-PRESSURE PIPELINES; CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS; HAZARDOUS GAS; RELEASE RATE; DAMAGE; BUILDINGS; TRANSPORTATION; MODEL; HOLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.003
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Natural gas industry is developing rapidly, and its accidents are threatening the urban safety. Risk management through quantitative assessment has become an important way to improve the safety performance of the natural gas supply system. In this paper, an integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network is proposed This method is composed of the probability assessment of accidents, the analysis of consequences and the evaluation of risk It is noteworthy that the consequences analyzed here include those of the outside and inside gas pipelines The analysis of consequences of the outside pipelines focuses on the individual risk and societal risk caused by different accidents, while those of the inside pipelines concerns about the risk of the economic loss because of the pressure re-distribution. Risk of a sample urban gas pipeline network is analyzed to demonstrate the presented method The results show that this presented integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network can be used in practical application Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier lid All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 436
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A quantitative risk analysis method for the natural gas pipeline network
    Jo, Y. -D.
    Park, K. -S.
    Kim, H. -S.
    Kim, J. -J.
    Kim, J. -Y.
    Ko, J. W.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS VII: SIMULATION AND HAZARD MITIGATION & BROWNFIELDS V: PREVENTION, ASSESSMENT, REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF BROWNFIELD SITES, 2010, : PI195 - PI203
  • [2] A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas
    Jo, YD
    Ahn, BJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2005, 123 (1-3) : 1 - 12
  • [3] Risk analysis of natural gas pipeline
    Jo, YD
    Park, KS
    Ko, JW
    Ahn, BJ
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS IV, 2004, 9 : 543 - 551
  • [4] Individual Risk Quantitative Evaluation of Natural Gas Pipeline
    Zhang, Peng
    Huang, Yahui
    Peng, Xingyu
    Zhou, Lili
    Zhang, Hua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK AND RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 587 - 590
  • [5] Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network
    Han, Z. Y.
    Weng, W. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 189 (1-2) : 509 - 518
  • [6] Quantitative Analysis of Risk Reduction of Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline with Explosion Proof Wall
    [J]. Chen, Guohua (mmghchen@scut.edu.cn), 2018, South China University of Technology (46):
  • [7] An integrated EDIB model for probabilistic risk analysis of natural gas pipeline leakage accidents
    Chen, Xing-lin
    Lin, Wei-Dong
    Liu, Chun-Xiang
    Yang, Fu-Qiang
    Guo, Yong
    Li, Xin
    Yuan, Shuai-Qi
    Reniers, Genserik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2023, 83
  • [8] Baye network quantitative risk analysis for failure of natural gas pipelines
    Hao, Yong-Mei
    Zhang, Chang-Shun
    Shao, Hui
    Wang, Meng-Tang
    [J]. Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2011, 32 (SUPPL. 2): : 321 - 325
  • [9] Risk Analysis of Natural Gas Pipeline: Case Study of a Generic Pipeline
    Vianello, Chiara
    Maschio, Giuseppe
    [J]. ICHEAP-10: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 24 : 1309 - 1314
  • [10] A Robustness Evaluation Method of Natural Gas Pipeline Network Based on Topological Structure Analysis
    Li, Xueyi
    Su, Huai
    Zhang, Jinjun
    Yang, Nan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9