Applying the Universal Design for Learning Framework to Mathematics Instruction for Learners With Extensive Support Needs

被引:18
|
作者
Root, Jenny R. [1 ]
Cox, Sarah K. [1 ]
Saunders, Alicia [2 ]
Gilley, Deidre [3 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Charlotte, NC USA
[3] Powell High Sch, Powell, TN USA
关键词
autism; general curriculum access; intellectual disability; mathematics; universal design for learning; STUDENTS; DISABILITIES;
D O I
10.1177/0741932519887235
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a mathematics intervention that utilized the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework on mathematical problem solving skills for three middle school students with extensive support needs (ESN). Participants were taught to solve percent of change word problems related to personal finance (calculating the final price after leaving a tip or purchasing a discounted item). Visual analysis of the multiple probe across participants design indicated a functional relation between the mathematics intervention and an increase in mathematical problem solving skills. Results are discussed in terms of acquisition and generalization of mathematical problem solving skills. Implications for application of the UDL framework to mathematics instruction for learners with ESN are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 206
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Learners with Severe Support Needs
    Hartmann, Elizabeth
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WHOLE SCHOOLING, 2015, 11 (01): : 54 - 67
  • [2] Applying a Universal Design for Learning Framework to Mediate the Language Demands of Mathematics
    Thomas, Cathy Newman
    Van Garderen, Delinda
    Scheuermann, Amy
    Lee, Eun Ju
    [J]. READING & WRITING QUARTERLY, 2015, 31 (03) : 207 - 234
  • [3] Approaching Explicit Instruction Within a Universal Design for Learning Framework
    Foxworth, Lauren L.
    Hashey, Andrew, I
    Dexter, Courtney
    Rasnitsyn, Shelly
    Beck, Rachel
    [J]. TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2022, 54 (04) : 268 - 275
  • [4] Promoting independence for learners who are deafdisabled: Designing instruction with universal design for learning
    Brandt, Sarah E.
    [J]. DEAFNESS & EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, 2024,
  • [5] Effective Literacy Instruction for Learners with Complex Support Needs
    Delano, Monica E.
    Rowlett, Lorita
    [J]. RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2018, 43 (04) : 289 - 290
  • [6] The application of the Universal Design for Learning framework to task design in order to support lower attaining children in the primary school mathematics classroom
    Wynne, Caitriona
    Harbison, Lorraine
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (CERME10), 2017, : 3766 - 3767
  • [7] The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction and Students With Extensive Support Needs in Inclusive Settings
    Raley, Sheida K.
    Burke, Kathryn M.
    Hagiwara, Mayumi
    Shogren, Karrie A.
    Wehmeyer, Michael L.
    Kurth, Jennifer A.
    [J]. INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 58 (01) : 82 - 90
  • [8] Parent Perceptions of Remote Instruction for Students with Extensive Support Needs
    Rossetti, Zach
    Lehr, Donna
    Shaheen, Tashnuva
    Baulier, Katie
    Burnette, Kristin
    Taub, Deborah
    [J]. RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2023, 48 (01) : 41 - 58
  • [9] Teacher Preparation in Communication Instruction for Students With Extensive Support Needs
    Pennington, Robert C.
    Walker, Virginia L.
    Tapp, Melissa C.
    [J]. TEACHER EDUCATION AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2021, 44 (03) : 239 - 254
  • [10] Postsecondary chemistry curricula and universal design for learning: planning for variations in learners' abilities, needs, and interests
    Scanlon, Erin
    Legron-Rodriguez, Tamra
    Schreffler, Jillian
    Ibadlit, Elijah
    Vasquez, Eleazar
    Chini, Jacquelyn J.
    [J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 19 (04) : 1216 - 1239