共 50 条
Evaluation of eLIFT for Noninvasive Assessment of Liver fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
被引:6
|作者:
Li, Qiang
[1
,2
]
Lu, Chuan
[1
]
Li, Weixia
[1
]
Huang, Yuxian
[1
,2
]
Chen, Liang
[1
]
机构:
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Publ Hlth Clin Ctr, Dept Hepatitis, Shanghai 201508, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
NATURAL-HISTORY;
PREDICT;
ELASTOGRAPHY;
GUIDELINES;
INDEX;
CHINA;
D O I:
10.1038/s41598-017-05718-x
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Recently, the easy Liver Fibrosis Test (eLIFT), a sum of points attributed to age, gender, gammaglutamyl transpeptidase, aspartate transaminase, platelets, and prothrombin time, was developed for diagnosing advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the performance of eLIFT to predict liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Histologic and laboratory data of 747 CHB patients were analyzed. The performance of eLIFT for diagnosing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis was compared with that of aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4). To predict advanced fibrosis, the AUROC of eLIFT was comparable with that of APRI (0.66 vs 0.71, p=0.095) and FIB-4 (0.66 vs 0.67, p=0.612). To predict severe fibrosis, the AUROC of eLIFT was lower than that of APRI (0.65 vs 0.83, p<0.001) and FIB-4 (0.65 vs 0.82, p < 0.001). To predict cirrhosis, the AUROC of eLIFT was also lower than that of APRI (0.64 vs 0.85, p = 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.64 vs 0.76, p = 0.033). The eLIFT is not a good non-invasive test for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in CHB patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文