Energetic trade-offs: Implications for selection between two bivalve prey species by a carnivorous muricid gastropod

被引:9
|
作者
Averbuj, A. [1 ]
Buchner-Miranda, J. A. [2 ]
Salas-Yanquin, L. P. [2 ]
Navarro, J. M. [2 ,3 ]
Pardo, L. M. [2 ,3 ]
Matos, A. S. [4 ]
Pechenik, J. A. [5 ]
Chaparro, O. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, CENPAT, Lab Reprod & Biol Integrat Invertebrados Marinos, IBIOMAR,CCT, Chubut, Argentina
[2] Univ Austral Chile, Inst Ciencias Marinas & Limnol, Valdivia, Chile
[3] Ctr FONDAP Invest Dinam Ecosistemas Marinos Altas, Valdivia, Chile
[4] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Biol, Ctr Ciencias, Lab Invertebrados Marinhos Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[5] Tufts Univ, Biol Dept, Medford, MA 02155 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
PERUMYTILUS-PURPURATUS LAMARCK; NUCELLA-LAPILLUS L; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; DEPENDENT PREDATION; METABOLIC COSTS; MUSSEL; CONSUMPTION; DOGWHELKS; SNAIL; RATES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0250937
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Active predators obtain energy and nutrients from prey through complex processes in which the energy gained must exceed the energy invested in finding and ingesting the prey. In addition, the amount of energy available will vary with the prey that are selected for consumption. The muricid gastropod Acanthina monodon inhabits rocky shores, where it routinely feeds on the mytilids Semimytilus algosus and Perumytilus purpuratus. In this study, S. algosus was highly preferred by the predator (over 90% were eaten) versus P. purpuratus (only 9% were eaten) when offered a mixed diet. The energetic cost of attacking one S. algosus individual was 91 J bivalve(-1) while for P. purpuratus it was slightly higher: 95 J bivalve(-1). Also, whereas A. monodon required on average 19 h to consume S. algosus, successful attacks on P. purpuratus required about 32% more time (25 h). In addition, a longer resting time was needed by the predator after preying on P. purpuratus before it initiated another attack. Moreover, the active metabolic costs associated with successfully attacking the prey increased 3.2 times over the basal metabolic costs when attacking S. algosus, but only by 2.5 times when attacking P. purpuratus. The calculations associated with preying on each species showed that the energetic gain per unit time likely accounts for the predator's preference for attacking S. algosus, even though predation on both species provided net energy gains for the predator. However, as S. algosus occurs seasonally at our study site, P. purpuratus would probably also be consumed due to its constant availability throughout the whole year.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade-offs between the persistence of foliage and productivity in two Pinus species
    C. R. Warren
    M. A. Adams
    [J]. Oecologia, 2000, 124 : 487 - 494
  • [2] Trade-offs between the persistence of foliage and productivity in two Pinus species
    Warren, CR
    Adams, MA
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 2000, 124 (04) : 487 - 494
  • [3] Leptin as a Physiological Mediator of Energetic Trade-Offs in Ecoimmunology: Implications for Disease
    French, Susannah S.
    Dearing, M. Denise
    Demas, Gregory E.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 51 (04) : 505 - 513
  • [4] Trade-offs between growth and defence in two phylogenetically close invasive species
    Gabrielle Thiébaut
    Anatole Boiché
    Damien Lemoine
    Marie-Hélène Barrat-Segretain
    [J]. Aquatic Ecology, 2017, 51 : 405 - 415
  • [5] Trade-offs between growth and defence in two phylogenetically close invasive species
    Thiebaut, Gabrielle
    Boiche, Anatole
    Lemoine, Damien
    Barrat-Segretain, Marie-Helene
    [J]. AQUATIC ECOLOGY, 2017, 51 (03) : 405 - 415
  • [6] A test of energetic trade-offs between growth and immune function in watersnakes
    Korfel, Chelsea A.
    Chamberlain, Jeremy D.
    Gifford, Matthew E.
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 2015, 179 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [7] A test of energetic trade-offs between growth and immune function in watersnakes
    Chelsea A. Korfel
    Jeremy D. Chamberlain
    Matthew E. Gifford
    [J]. Oecologia, 2015, 179 : 343 - 351
  • [8] How much energetic trade-offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
    Douhard, Frederic
    Douhard, Mathieu
    Gilbert, Helene
    Monget, Philippe
    Gaillard, Jean-Michel
    Lemaitre, Jean-Francois
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2021, 14 (12): : 2726 - 2749
  • [9] Trade-offs in covariate selection for species distribution models: a methodological comparison
    Brodie, Stephanie J.
    Thorson, James T.
    Carroll, Gemma
    Hazen, Elliott L.
    Bograd, Steven
    Haltuch, Melissa A.
    Holsman, Kirstin K.
    Kotwicki, Stan
    Samhouri, Jameal F.
    Willis-Norton, Ellen
    Selden, Rebecca L.
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2020, 43 (01) : 11 - 24
  • [10] Intertidal mussels exhibit energetic trade-offs between reproduction and stress resistance
    Petes, Laura E.
    Menge, Bruce A.
    Harris, Alyssa L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2008, 78 (03) : 387 - 402