Comparison of neural network and multiple linear regression as dissolution predictors

被引:30
|
作者
Sathe, PM
Venitz, J
机构
[1] US FDA, Off Gener Drugs, Div Bioequivalence, Rockville, MD 20855 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
neural network; multiple linear regression; dissolution; prediction;
D O I
10.1081/DDC-120018209
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The predictive performance of an artificial neural network (NN) was compared with the first-order multiple linear regression (MLR) using mean dissolution data of 28 diltiazem immediate release tablet formulations. The performance was evaluated using "Weibull" function parameters alpha and beta. Weibull parameters were used as dissolution markers of the eight principal, mainly compositional, variables. The parameters were obtained by fitting the Weibull function to the mean (n = 12) dissolution profiles of 28 diltiazem hydrochloride tablet formulations. The generated set of 28 pairs of Weibull function parameters was evaluated for internal and external predictability using both the MLR and the artificial NN. A three-layered 8-5-2 feedforward NN was found to be an adequate descriptor of the dissolution data. Internal predictions were based on the data of 24 products. External predictions used the 24 product data to test four products not used in the training phase. The predictive performances of the two techniques were evaluated using bias (mean prediction error; MPE) and precision (mean absolute error; MAE). The study results suggested that, for the studied data set, NN is a superior internal and external predictor to MLR. [GRAPHICS] The artificial NN predicted order of the formulation composition variables, influencing the dissolution parameters as follows: hydrogenated oil > microcrystallinecellulose > ethyl cellulose > eudragit > hydroxypropylcellulose > coat > hydroxypropylmethylcellulose > Speed.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 355
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between BP Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression Method
    Wang, Guoli
    Wu, Jianhui
    Yin, Sufeng
    Yu, Liqun
    Wang, Jing
    [J]. INFORMATION COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 6377 : 365 - 370
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS AS IN PREDICTORS OF FABRIC WEFT DEFECTS
    Kargi, V. Sinem Arikan
    [J]. TEKSTIL VE KONFEKSIYON, 2014, 24 (03): : 309 - 316
  • [4] Comparison of multiple linear regression and artificial neural network in developing the objective functions of the orthopaedic screws
    Hsu, Ching-Chi
    Lin, Jinn
    Chao, Ching-Kong
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 104 (03) : 341 - 348
  • [5] An Empirical Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network for Concrete Dam Deformation Modelling
    Li, Mingjun
    Wang, Junxing
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [6] EVAPORATION MODELLING BY MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
    Panwar, Rajdev
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Kumar, Devendra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 12 (01): : 289 - 294
  • [7] Comparison of multiple regression and artificial neural network performances in determining the order of importance of predictors in educational research
    Toprak, Emre
    Kalkan, Omur Kaya
    [J]. REVISTA DE EDUCACION, 2023, (399): : 233 - 268
  • [8] Comparison of Artificial Neural Network Models and Multiple Linear Regression Models in Cargo Port Performance Prediction
    Jayaprakash, P. Oliver
    Gunasekaran, K.
    Muralidharan, S.
    [J]. MEMS, NANO AND SMART SYSTEMS, PTS 1-6, 2012, 403-408 : 3570 - +
  • [9] Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models Goodness of Fit to Lactation Milk Yields
    Takma, Cigdem
    Atil, Hulya
    Aksakal, Vecihi
    [J]. KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2012, 18 (06) : 941 - 944
  • [10] Neural network model and multiple linear regression: another point of view
    Hubele, Norma F.
    Hwarng, H.Brian
    [J]. Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering - Proceedings (ANNIE'94), 1994, 4 : 199 - 203