Early results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacements

被引:6
|
作者
Subramanian, Sivaraman [1 ]
Jain, Kaushik D. [1 ]
Sreekumar, Ramakutty [1 ]
Fox, Una [1 ]
Hemmady, Mukesh [1 ]
Hodgkinson, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Wrightington Hosp, Ctr Hip Surg, Wigan WN6 9EP, Lancs, England
关键词
Femoral head; Allograft; Articular cartilage; Acetabular impaction; Hip replacement; CEMENTED CUP; FOLLOW-UP; BONE; ARTHROPLASTY; SURGERY; SOCKET;
D O I
10.1308/003588410X12518836439966
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION Extensive bone loss associated with revision hip surgery is a significant orthopaedic challenge. Acetabular reconstruction with the use of impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique in revision situations with cavitatory acetabular bone defects. Some use cancellous graft alone whilst others morselise the whole femoral head after removal of articular cartilage. This paper asks, if it really necessary to use pure cancellous graft? PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-two acetabular revisions using impacted morselised bone graft without removal of articular cartilage and a cemented cup were studied retrospectively. The mean follow-up was 3 years (range, 2-5.6 years). Clinical and radiographic assessment was made using the Oxford hip score, Hodgkinson's criteria (1988) for socket loosening and the Gie classification (1993) for evaluation of allograft consolidation and remodelling. RESULTS Forty (95%) sockets were considered radiologically stable (type 0, 1, 2 demarcations) and two (5%) sockets were radiologically loose (Type 3 demarcation). There was no socket migration in our series. Twenty-seven(64%) cases showed good trabecular remodelling (grade 3). Twelve (29%) cases showed trabecular incorporation (grade 2). Only three (7%) cases showed poor allograft incorporation (grade 1). Average pre-operative Oxford hip score was 41 and postoperative hip score was 27. There have been no socket re-revisions (100% survival) at an average of 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Early radiological and clinical survival results with retaining articular cartilage of femoral head allografts are similar and comparable to other major studies for acetabular impaction bone grafting in revisions. Minimal loss of allograft mass is 40% in obtaining pure cancellous graft. When there is a limited supply and demand of allograft, saving up to 40% of the material is a valuable and cost-effective use of scarce resources.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 30
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement
    Drampalos, E.
    Fadulelmola, A.
    Mohammed, R.
    Shaw, D.
    Subramanian, S.
    Jain, K. D.
    Hodgkinson, J.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2017, 99 (03) : 203 - 206
  • [2] Survivorship Analysis of Eighty Revised Hip Arthroplasties With the Impaction Grafting Technique Using Whole Femoral Head Allografts With the Articular Cartilage
    Fadulelmola, Ahmed
    Drampalos, Efstathios
    Hodgkinson, John
    Hemmady, Mukesh
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (06): : 1970 - 1975
  • [3] Midterm Results of Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting With an Allograft Combined With Hydroxyapatite in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Oshima, Seigo
    Yasunaga, Yuji
    Yamasaki, Takuma
    Yoshida, Tomokazu
    Hori, Junji
    Ochi, Mitsuo
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (03): : 470 - 476
  • [4] Impaction grafting and acetabular reinforcement in revision hip replacement
    Pitto, RP
    Di Muria, GV
    Hohmann, D
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1998, 22 (03) : 161 - 164
  • [5] Impaction grafting and acetabular reinforcement in revision hip replacement
    R. P. Pitto
    G. V. Di Muria
    D. Hohmann
    International Orthopaedics, 1998, 22 : 161 - 164
  • [6] Reconstruction of Acetabular and Femoral Bone Defects With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report
    Golnik, Vadim N.
    Peleganchuk, Vladimir A.
    Batrak, Yuriy M.
    Pavlov, Vitaliy V.
    Kirilova, Irina A.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2023, 29 (03): : 102 - 109
  • [7] Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement - Evolution of the technique and results
    Halliday, BR
    English, HW
    Timperley, AJ
    Gie, GA
    Ling, RSM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (06): : 809 - 817
  • [8] Femoral impaction grafting in revision hip arthroplasty with irradiated bone
    Robinson, DE
    Lee, MB
    Smith, EJ
    Learmonth, ID
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (07): : 834 - 840
  • [9] Cemented Revision Hip Arthroplasty With Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting
    Chimutengwende-Gordon, Mukai
    Baker, Markus P.
    Jagiello, Jakub
    Stamenkov, Roumen
    Callary, Stuart A.
    Smitham, Peter
    Howie, Donald W.
    Solomon, Lucian B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (14) : 591 - 595
  • [10] Both Acetabular and Femoral Reconstructions With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review
    Xiong, Liang
    Li, Hui
    Huang, Xianzhe
    Jie, Shuo
    Zhu, Weihong
    Pan, Jiankang
    Wu, Xiaoxin
    Mao, Xinzhan
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 24