Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process

被引:22
|
作者
Robotin, Monica C. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Sandra C. [3 ]
Biankin, Andrew V. [4 ,5 ]
Waters, Louise [3 ]
Iverson, Don [6 ]
Gooden, Helen [1 ]
Barraclough, Bruce [7 ]
Penman, Andrew G. [1 ]
机构
[1] NSW Canc Council, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Hlth Initiat, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Garvan Inst Med Res, Canc Res Program, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Banskstown Hosp, Dept Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Wollongong, Fac Hlth & Behav Sci, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Med, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
Research priorities; Pancreatic cancer; Delphi process; Nominal group; Focus group discussion; NURSING-RESEARCH PRIORITIES; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; QUALITY INDICATORS; CARE; HEALTH; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-010-9501-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in Australia and the fourth in the United States, yet research in PC is lagging behind that in other cancers associated with a high disease burden. In the absence of agreed processes to reliably identify research areas which can deliver significant advances in PC research, the Cancer Council NSW established a strategic partnership with the NSW Pancreatic Cancer Network to define critical research issues and opportunities that could accelerate progress in this field in Australia. The process consisted of five distinct stages: a literature review on recent progress in PC research, semi-structured expert interviews, a Delphi process, consumer focus groups, and a nominal group process. Information collected at each step informed the development of subsequent stages. The results from these steps were refined by the nominal group into a set of seven specific pancreatic cancer research goals. The goals were disseminated and led to a new funding scheme for key PC research priorities. This prioritisation exercise provided a much needed "road map" for research prioritisation in PC and served as a checklist to researchers applying for PC research grants to confirm how their research can contribute towards accelerating progress in PC research in Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 736
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining research priorities for pancreatic cancer in Australia: results of a consensus development process
    Monica C. Robotin
    Sandra C. Jones
    Andrew V. Biankin
    Louise Waters
    Don Iverson
    Helen Gooden
    Bruce Barraclough
    Andrew G. Penman
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2010, 21 : 729 - 736
  • [2] Defining priorities in prognostication research: results of a consensus workshop
    Stevinson, C.
    Preston, N.
    Todd, C.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (05) : 462 - 468
  • [3] Defining research and infrastructure priorities for cancer survivorship in Australia: a modified Delphi study
    Fiona Crawford-Williams
    Bogda Koczwara
    Raymond J. Chan
    Janette Vardy
    Karolina Lisy
    Julia Morris
    Mahesh Iddawela
    Gillian Mackay
    Michael Jefford
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 3805 - 3815
  • [4] Defining research and infrastructure priorities for cancer survivorship in Australia: a modified Delphi study
    Crawford-Williams, Fiona
    Koczwara, Bogda
    Chan, Raymond J.
    Vardy, Janette
    Lisy, Karolina
    Morris, Julia
    Iddawela, Mahesh
    Mackay, Gillian
    Jefford, Michael
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (05) : 3805 - 3815
  • [5] Priorities for implementation research on diagnosing cancer in primary care: a consensus process
    Thomas A Willis
    Richard D Neal
    Fiona M Walter
    Robbie Foy
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [6] Priorities for implementation research on diagnosing cancer in primary care: a consensus process
    Willis, Thomas A.
    Neal, Richard D.
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Foy, Robbie
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] Canadian integrative oncology research priorities: results of a consensus-building process
    Weeks, L. C.
    Seely, D.
    Balneaves, L. G.
    Boon, H. S.
    Leis, A.
    Oneschuk, D.
    Sagar, S. M.
    Verhoef, M. J.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (04) : E289 - E299
  • [8] Clinical research priorities in emergency medicine: Results of a consensus meeting and development of a weighting method for assessment of clinical research priorities
    Thom, Ogilvie
    Keijzers, Gerben
    Davies, Suzanne
    Taylor, David McD
    Knott, Jonathan
    Middleton, Paul M.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2014, 26 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [9] Top Ten Research Priorities for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer - Results of the Priority Setting Partnership Pancreatic Cancer Treatment
    Klotz, Rosa
    Dorr-Harim, Colette
    Ahmed, Azaz
    Tjadeni, Christine
    Diener, Markus K.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Mihaljevic, Andre L.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 43 : 222 - 222
  • [10] Priorities for research in child maltreatment, intimate partner violence and resilience to violence exposures: results of an international Delphi consensus development process
    Wathen, C. Nadine
    MacGregor, Jennifer C. D.
    Hammerton, Joanne
    Coben, Jeffrey H.
    Herrman, Helen
    Stewart, Donna E.
    MacMillan, Harriet L.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 12