Limbal Niche Cells and Three-Dimensional Matrigel-Induced Dedifferentiation of Mature Corneal Epithelial Cells

被引:8
|
作者
Zhu, Hui [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Tan, Yongyao [1 ]
Su, Guanyu [1 ]
Xu, Lingjuan [1 ]
Jiang, Meng Lin [1 ]
Li, Shen [1 ]
Meir, Yaa-Jyuhn James [3 ]
Wang, Yunming [2 ]
Li, Guigang [1 ]
Zhou, Huamin [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, State Key Lab Mat Proc & Die & Mould Technol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Coll Med, Linkou, Taiwan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
limbal niche cell; mature corneal epithelial cell; dedifferentiation; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; TRANSPLANTATION; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.63.5.1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To investigate the phenotypic changes of mature corneal epithelial cells (MCECs) that cocultured with limbal niche cells (LNCs) in three-dimensional Matrigel (3D Matrigel) in vitro. METHODS. MCECs were isolated from central corneas, and limbal epithelial progenitor cells (LEPCs) were isolated from limbal segments with Dispase II. LNCs were isolated and cultured from limbal niche using the collagenase A digestion method and identified with PCK/VIM/CD90/CD105/SCF/PDGFR beta. MCECs were cultured on 3D Matrigel (50%, v/v) with or without LNCs for 10 days. Expression of CK12 and p63 alpha and clone formation test were used to compare the progenitor phenotypic changes for MCECs before and after induction using LEPCs as control. RESULTS. Homogeneous LNCs were isolated and identified as spindle shape and adherent to a plastic surface coated with 5% Matrigel. Double immunostaining of the fourth-passage LNCs was uniformly PCK-/VIM+/CD90(+)/CD105(+)/SCF+/PDGFR beta(+). Reverse transcription and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) revealed the decrease of PCK expression from the second passage and elevation of Vim, CD90, CD105, SCF, and PDGFR beta transcripts from the third passage, and the transcription level of Vim, CD90, CD105, SCF, and PDGFR beta was elevated statistically in the fourth passage compared to the first passage (P < 0.01). Both immunofluorescence (IF) staining for cross section and cytospin cells demonstrated that MCECs expressed higher CK12 while lower p63 alpha than LEPCs (P < 0.01). Sphere growth formation was noticed as early as 24 hours in the MCEC + LNC group, 48 hours in the LEPC group, and 72 hours in the MCEC group. The diameters of the spheres were the biggest in the MCEC + LNC group (182.24 +/- 57.91 mu m), smaller in the LEPC group (125.71 +/- 41.20 mu m), and smallest in the MCEC group (109.39 +/- 34.85 mu m) by the end of the 10-day culture (P < 0.01). Double immunostaining with CK12/p63 alpha showed that cells in the sphere formed from MCECs expressed CK12 but not p63 alpha; in contrast, some cells in the MCEC + LNC group expressed CK12, but most of them expressed p63 alpha. RT-qPCR revealed a significant reduction of CK12 transcript but elevation of p63 alpha, Oct4, Nanog, Sox2, and SSEA4 (P < 0.05). Holoclone composed of cubic epithelial cells could be generated in the MCEC + LNC group but not in the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS. The data shows that human MCEC cell phenotype could be induced to the dedifferentiation stage when cocultured with LNCs in 3D Matrigel that simulated the microenvironment of limbal stem cells in vitro.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Matrigel-Induced Tubular Morphogenesis of Human Eccrine Sweat Gland Epithelial Cells
    Lei, Xia
    Liu, Bo
    Wu, Jinjin
    Lu, Yuangang
    Yang, Yadong
    ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2011, 294 (09): : 1525 - 1531
  • [2] Modeling prostate epithelial cancer cells in three-dimensional cultures in Matrigel.
    Fournier, Marcia V.
    Zhang, Xueping
    Ware, Joy L.
    Bissell, Mina J.
    Zehner, Zendra E.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (08)
  • [3] Matrigel-induced acinar differentiation is followed by apoptosis in HSG cells
    Szlavik, Vanda
    Vag, Janos
    Marko, Karoly
    Demeter, Kornel
    Madarasz, Emilia
    Olah, Imre
    Zelles, Tivadar
    O'Connell, Brian C.
    Varga, Gabor
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 103 (01) : 284 - 295
  • [4] Differences Between Niche Cells and Limbal Stromal Cells in Maintenance of Corneal Limbal Stem Cells
    Li, Yingli
    Inoue, Tomoyuki
    Takamatsu, Fumihiko
    Kobayashi, Takeshi
    Shiraishi, Atsushi
    Maeda, Naoyuki
    Ohashi, Yuichi
    Nishida, Kohji
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (03) : 1453 - 1462
  • [5] Micropatterns of Matrigel for three-dimensional epithelial cultures
    Sodunke, Temitope R.
    Turner, Keneshia K.
    Caldwell, Sarah A.
    McBride, Kevin W.
    Reginato, Mauricio J.
    Noh, Hongseok Moses
    BIOMATERIALS, 2007, 28 (27) : 4006 - 4016
  • [6] Rat limbal niche cells can induce transdifferentiation of oral mucosal epithelial cells into corneal epithelial-like cells in vitro
    Xin-Yue Zhao
    Hua-Tao Xie
    Chao-Ye Duan
    Jing Li
    Ming-Chang Zhang
    Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 9
  • [7] Rat limbal niche cells can induce transdifferentiation of oral mucosal epithelial cells into corneal epithelial-like cells in vitro
    Zhao, Xin-Yue
    Xie, Hua-Tao
    Duan, Chao-Ye
    Li, Jing
    Zhang, Ming-Chang
    STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2018, 9
  • [8] Three-dimensional reconstruction of the mouse limbal epithelial stem cell niche by immunofluorescence tomography
    Parfitt, Geraint John
    Kavianpour, Behdad
    Xie, Yilu
    Wu, Karen Ly
    Brown, Donald
    Jester, James V.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [9] Correction to: Rat limbal niche cells can induce transdifferentiation of oral mucosal epithelial cells into corneal epithelial-like cells in vitro
    X. Y. Zhao
    H. T. Xie
    C. Y. Duan
    J. Li
    M. C. Zhang
    Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 9
  • [10] Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells: Role of the Niche Microenvironment
    Ordonez, Paula
    Di Girolamo, Nick
    STEM CELLS, 2012, 30 (02) : 100 - 107