Prioritizing occupational injury prevention in the construction industry: Injury severity or absence?

被引:28
|
作者
Kines, Pete [1 ]
Spangenberg, Soren [1 ]
Dyreborg, Johnny [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Ctr Working Environm, Div Safety Res, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
absence risk; lost-time injuries; injury type; sprains and strains; fractures;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2006.09.002
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Problem: National occupational injury prevention goals often prioritize the reduction of serious injuries. This study analyzed whether this prioritization is credible in respect to lost-time injuries and short and long term work absence, and the implications this has for injury severity-based versus injury absence-based prevention approaches. Method: The data consisted of national and work-site specific injury and absence data from construction workers in Denmark, including workers from the Copenhagen Metro construction sites, during the period 2000-2001. Results and impact on industry and government: Absence length was significantly dependent on the type of injury. Sprains and strains were most prevalent and accounted for approximately one third of injuries and absence. Fractures accounted for one sixth of injuries and the greatest proportion of long-term absence. The results give credibility to the need for targeting sprains and strains in injury and absence prevention initiatives. (c) 2007 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 58
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevention of occupational injury in the construction industry
    Cross, J
    Trethewy, R
    Marosszeky, M
    [J]. READINGS IN INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL, 2000, : 115 - 118
  • [2] The distribution of occupational injury risks in the Victorian construction industry
    Larsson, TJ
    Field, B
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2002, 40 (05) : 439 - 456
  • [3] Disabling occupational injury in the US construction industry, 1996
    Courtney, TK
    Matz, S
    Webster, BS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2002, 44 (12) : 1161 - 1168
  • [4] Prioritizing Injury Prevention: Cause of Injury Text Analysis
    Bechtel, Kaitlin E.
    Sharrah, Mark L.
    Hood, Jessica M.
    Carney, Daniel E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA NURSING, 2021, 28 (02) : 79 - 83
  • [5] OCCUPATIONAL INJURY PREVENTION
    BAKER, SP
    CONROY, C
    JOHNSTON, JJ
    BENDER, TR
    CATTLEDGE, G
    CHU, GST
    DEJOY, D
    DUFFY, R
    EISENBERG, WM
    ELISBURG, D
    FELL, JC
    FINE, LJ
    GERBERICH, SG
    KINNEY, JA
    KRAUS, JF
    MARINE, W
    MCDOUGALL, V
    POLLACK, E
    REEVE, GR
    ROETTGER, RH
    RUNYAN, CW
    SEYMOUR, T
    SMITH, GS
    SPIELER, E
    STALLONES, L
    TRAVNICK, J
    WEEKS, JL
    ZWERLING, C
    FENLEY, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1992, 23 (02) : 129 - 133
  • [6] Injury prevention in industry
    Wheeler, CH
    [J]. GLOBAL ERGONOMICS, 1998, : 141 - 144
  • [7] Injury prevention in the occupational setting
    Ficca, M
    [J]. ATHLETIC THERAPY TODAY, 2003, 8 (03): : 6 - 8
  • [8] Occupational ergonomics and injury prevention
    Stobbe, TJ
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-STATE OF THE ART REVIEWS, 1996, 11 (03): : 531 - 543
  • [9] Occupational injury risk assessment using injury severity odds ratios: Male falls from heights in the Danish construction industry, 1993-1999
    Kines, P
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2001, 7 (07): : 1929 - 1943
  • [10] Prioritizing industries for occupational injury prevention and research in the Services Sector in Washington State, 2002–2010
    Naomi J Anderson
    David K Bonauto
    Darrin Adams
    [J]. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 9