Effects of the myosin ATPase inhibitor 2,3-butanedione monoxime on amyloplast kinetics and gravitropism of Arabidopsis hypocotyls

被引:7
|
作者
Palmieri, Maria [1 ]
Schwind, Melissa A. [1 ]
Stevens, Martin Henry H. [1 ]
Edelmann, Richard E. [1 ]
Kiss, John Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Bot, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00926.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The actin cytoskeleton is a crucial component in plant gravitropism, and studies confirm that alterations to actin filaments (F-actin) can have dramatic effects on gravitropic curvature in roots and shoots. Many models for gravisensing in higher plants suggest that the key to gravity perception and signal transduction lies in intimate interactions between F-actin and amyloplasts. In this study, we investigated gravitropism in hypocotyls by analyzing the effect of myosin inhibition on gravitropic curvature in order to clarify the role of the actomyosin system in shoot gravitropism. To study amyloplast movement in endodermal cells (i.e., gravity-perceiving statocytes) of living seedlings, we repositioned a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) so that its rotatable stage was oriented vertically. Seedlings containing green fluorescent protein-labeled endodermal amyloplasts were incubated with the ATPase inhibitor 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) and then mounted on the stage so that the hypocotyls were vertical. Using CLSM, we imaged the endodermal amyloplasts, while the hypocotyls were oriented vertically and also after they were reoriented by 90 degrees. Our results show that BDM reduces gravitropic curvature in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, BDM increases amyloplast movement in hypocotyls of vertical seedlings, but reduces amyloplast movement in hypocotyls of reoriented seedlings, suggesting that myosin may participate in the intracellular transport of amyloplasts in statocytes. These results can be explained in the context of amyloplasts as both noise indicators and gravity susceptors, with BDM producing less coherent amyloplast movement that results in an increased signal-to-noise ratio, which may account for at least part of the observed reduction in gravitopic curvature.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 626
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2,3-Butanedione monoxime (BDM) as a myosin inhibitor
    Ostap, EM
    JOURNAL OF MUSCLE RESEARCH AND CELL MOTILITY, 2002, 23 (04) : 305 - 308
  • [2] 2,3-Butanedione monoxime (BDM) as a myosin inhibitor
    E. Michael Ostap
    Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility, 2002, 23 : 305 - 308
  • [3] Effects of the myosin inhibitor 2,3-butanedione monoxime on the physiology of fission yeast
    Steinberg, G
    McIntosh, JR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1998, 77 (04) : 284 - 293
  • [4] Mechanism of inhibition of cytoplasmic streaming by a myosin inhibitor, 2,3-butanedione monoxime
    M. Tominaga
    E. Yokota
    S. Sonobe
    T. Shimmen
    Protoplasma, 2000, 213 : 46 - 54
  • [5] PORCINE CARDIAC MYOSIN ATPASE ACTIVITY INHIBITION BY BDM (2,3-BUTANEDIONE MONOXIME)
    SCORDILIS, SP
    DICKSON, KA
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 1992, 3 : A158 - A158
  • [6] Mechanism of inhibition of cytoplasmic streaming by a myosin inhibitor, 2,3-butanedione monoxime
    Tominaga, M
    Yokota, E
    Sonobe, S
    Shimmen, T
    PROTOPLASMA, 2000, 213 (1-2) : 46 - 54
  • [7] Does 2,3-butanedione monoxime inhibit nonmuscle myosin?
    Arthur Forer
    Lacramioara Fabian
    Protoplasma, 2005, 225 : 1 - 4
  • [8] MULTIPLE EFFECTS OF 2,3-BUTANEDIONE MONOXIME
    SELLIN, LC
    MCARDLE, JJ
    PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 74 (06): : 305 - 313
  • [9] The myosin ATPase inhibitor, 2,3-butanedione 2-monoxime, prevents protein secretion by the basidiomycete Coprinopsis cinerea
    Kohsuke Hashimoto
    Etsuo Yokota
    Teruo Shimmen
    Makoto Yoshida
    Biotechnology Letters, 2011, 33 : 769 - 775
  • [10] The myosin ATPase inhibitor, 2,3-butanedione 2-monoxime, prevents protein secretion by the basidiomycete Coprinopsis cinerea
    Hashimoto, Kohsuke
    Yokota, Etsuo
    Shimmen, Teruo
    Yoshida, Makoto
    BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 33 (04) : 769 - 775