A comparison of the test-negative and traditional case-control study designs with respect to the bias of estimates of rotavirus vaccine effectiveness

被引:14
|
作者
Haber, Michael [1 ]
Lopman, Benjamin A. [2 ,3 ]
Tate, Jacqueline E. [3 ]
Shi, Meng [1 ]
Parashar, Umesh D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Case-control study; Test-negative study; Rotavirus; Vaccine effectiveness; Bias; YOUNG-CHILDREN; INFLUENZA; ETIOLOGY; DISEASE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.072
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Estimation of the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines via the test-negative control study design has gained popularity over the past few years. In this study design, children with severe diarrhea who test positive for rotavirus infection are considered as cases, while children who test negative serve as controls. We use a simple probability model to evaluate and compare the test-negative control and the traditional case control designs with respect to the bias of resulting estimates of rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE). Comparisons are performed under two scenarios, corresponding to studies performed in high-income and low-income countries. We consider two potential sources of bias: (a) misclassification bias resulting from imperfect sensitivity and specificity of the test used to diagnose rotavirus infection, and (b) selection bias associated with possible effect of rotavirus vaccination on the probability of contracting severe nonrotavirus diarrhea. Our results suggest that both sources of bias may produce VE estimates with substantial bias. Particularly, lack of perfect specificity is associated with severe negative bias. For example, if the specificity of the diagnostic test is 90% then VE estimates from both types of case-control studies may underestimate the true VE by more than 20%. If the vaccine protects children against non-rotavirus diarrhea then VE estimates from test-negative control studies may be close to zero even though the true VE is 50%. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the enzyme immunoassay test currently used to diagnose rotavirus infections are both over 99%, and there is no solid evidence that the existing rotavirus vaccines affect the rates of non-rotavirus diarrhea. We therefore conclude that the test-negative control study design is a convenient and reliable alternative for estimation of rotavirus VE. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5071 / 5076
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of the test-negative and the traditional case-control study designs for estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness under nonrandom vaccination
    Meng Shi
    Qian An
    Kylie E. C. Ainslie
    Michael Haber
    Walter A. Orenstein
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 17
  • [2] A comparison of the test-negative and the traditional case-control study designs for estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness under nonrandom vaccination
    Shi, Meng
    An, Qian
    Ainslie, Kylie E. C.
    Haber, Michael
    Orenstein, Walter A.
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 17 : 757
  • [3] Case-Control Study of Rotavirus Vaccine Effectiveness Compared to Test-Negative Controls or Hospital Controls
    Araki, Kaoru
    Hara, Megumi
    Shimanoe, Chisato
    Nishida, Yuichiro
    Matsuo, Muneaki
    Tanaka, Keitaro
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (08) : 282 - 287
  • [4] Feasibility of case-control and test-negative designs to evaluate dengue vaccine effectiveness in Malaysia
    Nealon, Joshua
    Lim, Wei-Yin
    Moureau, Annick
    Lojikip, Sharon Linus
    Junus, Suria
    Kumar, Suresh
    Nachiappan, Jeyaseelan P.
    Sekaran, Shamala Devi
    Radigue, Cedric
    Cowling, Benjamin J.
    Ochiai, R. Leon
    Amar-Singh, H. S. S.
    VACCINE, 2019, 37 (39) : 5891 - 5898
  • [5] Test-Negative Study Designs for Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness
    Dean, Natalie
    Amin, Avnika B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 332 (02): : 163 - 164
  • [6] On the bias of estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness from test-negative studies
    Ainslie, Kylie E. C.
    Shi, Meng
    Haber, Michael
    Orenstein, Walter A.
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (52) : 7297 - 7301
  • [7] EVALUATION OF THE TEST-NEGATIVE CASE-CONTROL DESIGN TO ESTIMATE ROTAVIRUS VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS IN LOW-INCOME SETTINGS
    Schwartz, Lauren M.
    Halloran, M. Elizabeth
    Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
    Neuzil, Kathleen M.
    Victor, J. Chris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2017, 95 (05): : 377 - 378
  • [8] Effectiveness and impact of monovalent rotavirus vaccination in Afghanistan: a test-negative case-control analysis
    Anwari, Palwasha
    Burnett, Eleanor
    Safi, Najibullah
    Samsor, Akmal
    Safi, Helah
    Chavers, Tyler P.
    Parashar, Umesh D.
    Clark, Andrew D.
    Tate, Jacqueline E.
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2024, 12 (09): : e1517 - e1525
  • [9] Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case-control studies
    Habibzadeh, Farrokh
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [10] The impact of selection bias on vaccine effectiveness estimates from test-negative studies
    Jackson, Michael L.
    Phillips, C. Hallie
    Benoit, Joyce
    Kiniry, Erika
    Madziwa, Lawrence
    Nelson, Jennifer C.
    Jackson, Lisa A.
    VACCINE, 2018, 36 (05) : 751 - 757