Clinical utility of FoundationOne tissue molecular profiling in men with metastatic prostate cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Zhu, Jason [1 ]
Tucker, Matthew [1 ]
Marin, Daniele [2 ]
Gupta, Rajan T. [2 ,3 ]
Healy, Patrick [4 ]
Humeniuk, Michael [5 ]
Jarvis, Casey [1 ]
Zhang, Tian [1 ,3 ]
McNamara, Megan [1 ,3 ]
George, Daniel J. [1 ,3 ]
Wu, Yuan [4 ]
Lisi, Stacey [3 ]
Armstrong, Andrew J. [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Ctr Prostate & Urol Canc, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat, Durham, NC USA
[5] Gibbs Canc Ctr, Spartanburg Reg Healthcare Syst, Spartanburg, SC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Dept Pharmacol & Canc Biol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Tumor genomic profiling; Real world outcomes; Precision oncology; MITOXANTRONE PLUS PREDNISONE; INCREASED SURVIVAL; SOLID TUMORS; ABIRATERONE; DOCETAXEL; ENZALUTAMIDE; MUTATIONS; IMMUNOTHERAPY; OLAPARIB;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.06.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Targeted inhibitors and immunotherapy have entered the treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer. Genomic testing may uncover which patients benefit most from these therapies. We report the clinical utility and benefits of FoundationOne testing in men with advanced prostate cancer. Patients and methods: We retrospectively identified all men with prostate cancer who received tissue FoundationOne testing at our institution between January 2010 and April 2017. Genomic alterations, treatment selection based on FoundationOne results, and clinical outcomes including response and duration of therapy following matched targeted therapy were analyzed. Results: A total of 77 men with metastatic prostate cancer were referred for FoundationOne testing; 59 (77%) had sufficient tumor tissue for testing. Of these, 22% (17/77) of men had a targetable mutation and 9% (7/77) of men received matched off-label targeted therapy. Overall, 5% (4/77) of patients derived clinical benefit. One patient with a BRCA2 loss had a complete response on olaparib (>27 months) and 3 patients (ATM substitution, PALB2 frameshift, CDK12 frameshift) had stable disease with olaparib (10.3, 18.7, and 7.8 months, respectively). Three patients (BRCA2 frameshift, PDL1 + PDL2 amplification, PMS2 missense) had progressive disease despite targeted therapy. Conclusions: Tissue genomic testing can uncover patients who may benefit from targeted therapies such as poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or immunotherapy. In our limited single institution study, genomic testing led to clinical benefit in 5% of patients. Combined germline and circulating tumor DNA testing may be helpful to identify additional patients suitable for matched genomic therapies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:813.e1 / 813.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical utility of Foundation One tissue molecular profiling in men with metastatic prostate cancer.
    Zhu, Jason
    Tucker, Matthew D.
    Healy, Patrick
    Humeniuk, Michael Sandon
    Jarvis, Casey
    George, Daniel J.
    Armstrong, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [2] The clinical utility of molecular genetic cancer profiling
    Joseph, Loren
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2016, 16 (08) : 827 - 838
  • [3] Feasibility and clinical utility of molecular profiling among metastatic cancer patients: A cancer center experience in Philippines
    Cristal Luna, Herdee Gloriane
    Morelos, Amherstia
    Milisa Catadral, Mary
    Lea Lava, Ana
    Love Malasig, April
    Dennis Pinzon, Jomer
    Roberto Amparo, Jose
    Lola, Conrado
    Cristal-Luna, Gloria R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [4] Clinical utility of complex multi-platform profiling in metastatic cancer patients
    Garcia Foncillas, J.
    Aftimos, P. G.
    Barthelemy, P.
    Bellmunt, J.
    Berchem, G.
    Camps, C.
    de las Penas, R.
    Finzel, A.
    Hervonen, J. P.
    Joensuu, T.
    Kong, A.
    Mackay, J.
    Mikropoulos, C.
    Mokbel, K.
    Mouysset, J-L.
    Perren, T-J.
    Guitti, G.
    Laes, J-F.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [5] Integrative molecular profiling of routine clinical prostate cancer specimens
    Grasso, C. S.
    Cani, A. K.
    Hovelson, D. H.
    Quist, M. J.
    Douville, N. J.
    Yadati, V.
    Amin, A. M.
    Nelson, P. S.
    Betz, B. L.
    Liu, C-J.
    Knudsen, K. E.
    Cooney, K. A.
    Feng, F. Y.
    McDaniel, A. S.
    Tomlins, S. A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) : 1110 - 1118
  • [6] Molecular and functional profiling for an improved clinical management of prostate cancer
    Sueltmann, H.
    Schlomm, T.
    Hellwinkel, O.
    Buness, A.
    Ruschhaupt, M.
    Erbersdobler, A.
    Luebke, A.
    Luu, V. D.
    Huland, H.
    Poustka, A.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (04): : 281 - 281
  • [7] Molecular profiling of protein methyltransferases in prostate cancer and their clinical significance
    Jiang, Yuanyuan
    Liu, Lanxin
    Weinfeld, David
    Shan, Wenqi
    Yu, Huimei
    Guo, Xuhui
    Yang, Zhe
    Yang, Zeng-Quan
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [8] Molecular profiling and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer
    Liu, R.
    Yang, T.
    Wang, H.
    Lou, F.
    Cao, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S1331 - S1331
  • [9] Molecular profiling of prostate cancer
    Andrieu, Claudia
    Karsenty, Gilles
    Seillan, Claire
    Rocchi, Palma
    METABOLISMES HORMONES DIABETES ET NUTRITION, 2008, 12 (02): : 76 - +
  • [10] Molecular profiling in prostate cancer
    Feroze-Merzoug, F
    Schober, MS
    Chen, YQ
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2001, 20 (3-4) : 165 - 171