Exploring possible transition pathways for hydrogen energy: A hybrid approach using socio-technical scenarios and energy system modelling

被引:92
|
作者
McDowall, Will [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCL Energy Inst, London WC1H 0NN, England
[2] UCL Inst Sustainable Resources, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Socio-technical scenarios; Energy system modelling; Hydrogen energy; Exploratory scenarios; FUEL-CELL VEHICLES; INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT; MARKET PENETRATION; ROAD TRANSPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; FUTURES; FRAMEWORK; ECONOMY; STRATEGIES; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.futures.2014.07.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Hydrogen remains an important option for long-term decarbonisation of energy and transport systems. However, studying the possible transition paths and development prospects for a hydrogen energy system is challenging. The long-term nature of technological transitions inevitably means profound uncertainties, diverging perspectives and contested priorities. Both modelling approaches and narrative storyline scenarios are widely used to explore the possible future of hydrogen energy, but each approach has shortcomings. This paper presents a hybrid approach to assessing hydrogen transitions in the UK, by confronting qualitative socio-technical scenarios with quantitative energy systems modelling, through a process of 'dialogue' between scenario and model. Three possible transition pathways are explored, each exploring different uncertainties and possible decision points. Conclusions are drawn for both the future of hydrogen, and on the value of an approach that brings quantitative formal models and narrative scenario techniques into dialogue. (C) 2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing transition pathways to low-carbon electricity generation in Kenya: A hybrid approach using backcasting, socio-technical scenarios and energy system modelling
    Kehbila, Anderson Gwanyebit
    R.K., Masumbuko
    M., Ogeya
    P., Osano
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 2021, 1
  • [2] Modelling transport energy demand: A socio-technical approach
    Anable, Jillian
    Brand, Christian
    Martino Tran
    Eyre, Nick
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 41 : 125 - 138
  • [3] Modelling Socio-Technical Transition Patterns and Pathways
    Bergman, Noam
    Haxeltine, Alex
    Whitmarsh, Lorraine
    Koehler, Jonathan
    Schilperoord, Michel
    Rotmans, Jan
    JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2008, 11 (03):
  • [4] Exploring socio-technical future scenarios in the media: the energy transition case in Italian daily newspapers
    Neresini F.
    Giardullo P.
    Di Buccio E.
    Cammozzo A.
    Quality & Quantity, 2020, 54 (1) : 147 - 168
  • [5] Context scenarios and their usage for the construction of socio-technical energy scenarios
    Weimer-Jehle, Wolfgang
    Buchgeister, Jens
    Hauser, Wolfgang
    Kosow, Hannah
    Naegler, Tobias
    Poganietz, Witold-Roger
    Pregger, Thomas
    Prehofer, Sigrid
    von Recklinghausen, Andreas
    Schippl, Jens
    Voegele, Stefan
    ENERGY, 2016, 111 : 956 - 970
  • [6] Socio-technical modelling of UK energy transition under three global SSPs, with implications for IAM scenarios
    Freeman, Rachel
    Pye, Steve
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (12)
  • [7] Lifestyle, efficiency and limits: modelling transport energy and emissions using a socio-technical approach
    Christian Brand
    Jillian Anable
    Craig Morton
    Energy Efficiency, 2019, 12 : 187 - 207
  • [8] Lifestyle, efficiency and limits: modelling transport energy and emissions using a socio-technical approach
    Brand, Christian
    Anable, Jillian
    Morton, Craig
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2019, 12 (01) : 187 - 207
  • [9] Energy Modelling as a Trigger for Energy Communities: A Joint Socio-Technical Perspective
    Bukovszki, Viktor
    Magyari, Abel
    Braun, Marina Kristina
    Pardi, Kitti
    Reith, Andras
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (09)
  • [10] Suburbia under an Energy Transition: A Socio-technical Perspective
    Dodson, Jago
    URBAN STUDIES, 2014, 51 (07) : 1487 - 1505