Risk factors for cesarean section by category of health service

被引:20
|
作者
Mendoza-Sassi, Raul Andres [1 ]
Cesar, Juraci Almeida [1 ]
da Silva, Patricia Rodrigues [1 ]
Denardin, Giovana [1 ]
Rodrigues, Mariana Mendes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande, Fac Med, Divisao Populacao & Saude, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2010年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
Cesarean Section; Risk Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Health Maintenance Organizations; Supplemental Health; Single Health System; Cross-Sectional Studies; SOUTHERN BRAZIL; PERINATAL HEALTH; LATIN-AMERICA; BIRTH COHORT; 2ND OPINION; RATES; DELIVERY; INEQUALITIES; PRIVATE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1590/S0034-89102010000100009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the rate of cesarean section and differences in risk factors by category of health service, either public or private. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out including all pregnant women in labor admitted to hospitals in the city of Rio Grande, Southern Brazil, between January 1 and December 31, 2007. A pre-coded and pretested questionnaire was used to collect on social, demographic, obstetric and newborn care information. Two regression models were constructed: one for public users and the other one for private ones. Poisson regression was used in each model in the multivariate analysis. Prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each adjusted factor. RESULTS: The rate of cesarean section was 43% and 86% among public and private users. Sociodemographic factors and twin births have a more significant impact among public users as well as number of pregnancies (25% vs. 13% reduction in public and private users, respectively) and previous cesarean section (86% vs. 24% increase in public and private users, respectively). Prenatal care visits and hospital admissions affected the outcome only in women users of public services. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean section rates were high in both groups studied, but it was twice as high among women cared in the private sector. Associated factors differ in magnitude by category of service used.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the risk factors for cesarean section
    Leite de Carvalho Silva, Simone Angelica
    de Moraes Filho, Olimpio Barbosa
    Fernandes Costa, Cicero Ferreira
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2005, 27 (04): : 189 - 196
  • [2] Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section
    Kessous, Roy
    Danor, Daniela
    Weintraub, Y. Adi
    Wiznitzer, Arnon
    Sergienko, Ruslan
    Obel, Iris
    Sheiner, Eyal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (11): : 2167 - 2170
  • [3] Psychosocial risk factors for emergency cesarean section
    Takacs, L.
    Seidlerova, Mlikova J.
    Cepicky, P.
    [J]. CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 84 (01): : 33 - 39
  • [4] Risk factors for PONV after cesarean section
    Nunes Guimaraes, Gabriel Magalhaes
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2020, 70 (05): : 451 - 451
  • [5] Timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section
    Eran Hadar
    Nir Melamed
    Keren Tzadikevitch-Geffen
    Yariv Yogev
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 283 : 735 - 741
  • [6] RISK-FACTORS IN CESAREAN-SECTION INFECTION
    HAGGLUND, L
    CHRISTENSEN, KV
    CHRISTENSEN, P
    KAMME, C
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1983, 62 (02): : 145 - 150
  • [7] Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean section
    Alcocer Urueta, Jaime
    Bonilla Mares, Marcela
    Gorbea Chavez, Viridiana
    Velazquez Valassi, Beatriz
    [J]. ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2009, 33 (07): : 806 - 810
  • [8] Timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section
    Hadar, Eran
    Melamed, Nir
    Tzadikevitch-Geffen, Keren
    Yogev, Yariv
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 283 (04) : 735 - 741
  • [9] Risk factors for development of isthmocele following cesarean section
    Sisti, G.
    Nasioudis, D.
    Kanninen, T.
    Sorbi, F.
    Fambrini, M.
    [J]. MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2015, 67 (04): : 301 - 306
  • [10] Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?
    Roman, Horace
    Blondel, Beatrice
    Breart, Gerard
    Goffinet, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (04) : 297 - 305