Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods

被引:68
|
作者
Llopis, Paula Montero [1 ]
Senft, Rebecca A. [2 ]
Ross-Elliott, Tim J. [1 ]
Stephansky, Ryan [1 ]
Keeley, Daniel P. [3 ]
Koshar, Preman [3 ]
Marques, Guillermo [4 ,5 ]
Gao, Ya-Sheng [6 ]
Carlson, Benjamin R. [6 ]
Pengo, Thomas [7 ]
Sanders, Mark A. [4 ,5 ]
Cameron, Lisa A. [6 ]
Itano, Michelle S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, MicRoN Core, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Blavatnik Inst, Dept Genet, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Neurosci Microscopy Core, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Univ Imaging Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurosci, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Duke Univ, Duke Light Microscopy Core Facil, Durham, NC USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Informat Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
OXYGEN SPECIES PRODUCTION; BEGINNERS GUIDE; CELL; PHOTOTOXICITY; PROTEINS; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; RESOLUTION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1038/s41592-021-01156-w
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Comprehensive guidelines and resources to enable accurate reporting for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities are reported with the goal of improving microscopy reporting, rigor and reproducibility. Although fluorescence microscopy is ubiquitous in biomedical research, microscopy methods reporting is inconsistent and perhaps undervalued. We emphasize the importance of appropriate microscopy methods reporting and seek to educate researchers about how microscopy metadata impact data interpretation. We provide comprehensive guidelines and resources to enable accurate reporting for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities. We aim to improve microscopy reporting, thus improving the quality, rigor and reproducibility of image-based science.
引用
收藏
页码:1463 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods
    Paula Montero Llopis
    Rebecca A. Senft
    Tim J. Ross-Elliott
    Ryan Stephansky
    Daniel P. Keeley
    Preman Koshar
    Guillermo Marqués
    Ya-Sheng Gao
    Benjamin R. Carlson
    Thomas Pengo
    Mark A. Sanders
    Lisa A. Cameron
    Michelle S. Itano
    Nature Methods, 2021, 18 : 1463 - 1476
  • [2] Best Practices for Fluorescence Microscopy of the Cyanobacterial Circadian Clock
    Cohen, Susan E.
    Erb, Marcella L.
    Pogliano, Joe
    Golden, Susan S.
    CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS AND BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS, PT A, 2015, 551 : 211 - 221
  • [3] Best practices for reproducible research
    National University of Colombia, University of Campinas, Brazil
    XRDS: Crossroads, 2019, 3 (10-11): : 10 - 11
  • [4] BEST PRACTICES IN REPORTING DIVERSITY
    Beuran, Rares
    GLOBALIZATION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE: MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES - JOURNALISM, 2014, : 104 - 109
  • [5] Best practices in reporting channels
    Suana, Oliver Pascual
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL, 2023, 9 (02) : 575 - 607
  • [6] Centrifugation: Best Practices for Reliable, Reproducible Results
    Tansey, Hugh
    AMERICAN LABORATORY, 2018, 50 (02) : 36 - 37
  • [7] Reproducible Research: Best Practices and Potential Misuse
    Bjornson, Emil
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2019, 36 (03) : 106 - +
  • [8] Best Practices for Making Reproducible Biochemical Models
    Porubsky, Veronica L.
    Goldberg, Arthur P.
    Rampadarath, Anand K.
    Nickerson, David P.
    Karr, Jonathan R.
    Sauro, Herbert M.
    CELL SYSTEMS, 2020, 11 (02) : 109 - 120
  • [9] The city challenges and external agents. Methods, tools and best practices
    Papa, Rocco
    TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 14 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [10] Reporting Quantitative Methods and Findings: Best Practices Fidelity in the Leisure Science Literature
    Duerden, Mat D.
    Layland, Eric Keith
    Lacanienta, Andrew
    Hodge, Camilla
    Goates, Michael
    Edwards, Michael B.
    LEISURE SCIENCES, 2022, 44 (03) : 385 - 400