The KC method: Numerical investigation of a new analysis method for reinforced soil walls

被引:5
|
作者
Klars, Assaf [1 ]
Sas, Tal [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Reinforced soil; Retaining walls; Minimization; Differential Evolution; Genetic algorithm; Continuum analysis; Segmental walls; PREDICTION; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.12.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Reinforced soil walls commonly include facing elements which affect the mechanical behavior of the system. However, the design procedures involved in the existing codes and manuals (e.g. FHWA, BS8006, AASHTO, etc.) do not consider the structural contribution of the facing to the wall stability. Recently, a new computer based method for the analysis of reinforced soil walls which takes into account the interaction between the facing and the soil reinforcement layers was presented [Klar A and Sas T. Rational approach for the analysis of segmental reinforced soil walls based on kinematic constraints. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2009;27:332-340]. This method demands full compatibility between the reinforcement layers and the deforming wall, and is solved as an optimization problem on this constraint. This kinematic compatibility (KC) method entails several assumptions regarding the interaction between the three components of the system (soil, wall, and reinforcement). This paper compares the KC method to a more rigorous continuum analysis. Results show that the KC method is capable of replicating the behavior of the more rigorous system, with a good agreement on both the value of maximum tensile forces in the reinforcement and shear and bending moment distributions along the wall. The KC method has a certain advantage over continuum methods, such as finite element or finite difference, since it requires limited input data that can easily be obtained from field tests. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 358
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A New Method for Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Soil
    Jie, Yu-xin
    Zhang, Bin
    Li, Guang-xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2012, 40 (04) : 586 - 596
  • [2] New method for prediction of loads in steel reinforced soil walls
    Allen, TM
    Bathurst, RJ
    Holtz, RD
    Lee, WF
    Walters, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (11) : 1109 - 1120
  • [3] Dimension analysis on reinforced soil walls by finite element method
    Huang, GJ
    Yu, XJ
    Yang, CW
    [J]. LANDMARKS IN EARTH REINFORCEMENT, VOL 1, 2001, : 363 - 368
  • [4] WORKING STRESS DESIGN METHOD FOR REINFORCED SOIL WALLS
    EHRLICH, M
    MITCHELL, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (04): : 625 - 647
  • [5] Numerical Limit Analysis of the Stability of Reinforced Retaining Walls with the Strength Reduction Method
    Li, Jinsheng
    Li, Xueqi
    Jing, Mingyuan
    Pang, Rui
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [6] A new slice method for seismic stability analysis of reinforced retaining walls
    Jiang Jianqing
    Yang Guolin
    [J]. ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 164 - +
  • [7] Embankments on Soft Soil Reinforced with Stone Columns: Numerical Analysis and Proposal of a New Design Method
    Borges, Jose
    Domingues, Tiago
    Cardoso, Antonio
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 27 (06) : 667 - 679
  • [8] Modified equivalent additional stress method for numerical analysis of reinforced soil
    Jie Yu-xin
    Wang Nai-dong
    Li Guang-xin
    [J]. ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2007, 28 : 129 - 132
  • [9] Modified equivalent additional stress method for numerical analysis of reinforced soil
    Jie, Yu-Xin
    Wang, Nai-Dong
    Li, Guang-Xin
    [J]. Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28 (SUPPL.): : 129 - 132
  • [10] WORKING STRESS DESIGN METHOD FOR REINFORCED SOIL WALLS - CLOSURE
    EHRLICH, M
    MITCHELL, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (11): : 820 - 821