The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects

被引:15
|
作者
Jamrozik, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
medical ethics; epidemiology; regulation; genetics;
D O I
10.1136/jme.26.5.334
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing emphasis on evidence-based clinical practice has thrown into sharp focus multiple deficiencies in current systems of ethical review. This paper argues that a complete overhaul of systems for ethical oversight of studies involving human subjects is now required as developments in medical, epidemiological and genetic research have outstripped existing structures for ethical supervision. It shows that many problems are now evident and concludes that sequential and piecemeal amendments to present arrangements an inadequate to address these. Ar their core present systems of ethical review still rely on the integrity and judgement of individual investigators. One possible alternative is to train and license research investigators, make explicit their responsibilities and have ethics committees devote much more of their time to monitoring research activity in order to detect those infringing the rules.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 339
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revolution or Reform in Human Subjects Research Oversight
    Joffe, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2012, 40 (04): : 922 - 929
  • [2] Improving Protection for Human Research Subjects: Better Oversight, Not Just More Oversight
    Schluger, Neil W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2008, 8 (11): : 13 - 15
  • [3] Federal oversight and regulation of human subjects research - An update
    Spicer, CM
    [J]. KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 2000, 10 (03) : 261 - 264
  • [4] 'Human subjects research' as stigmatized activity: Implications for oversight reform
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    [J]. CORTEX, 2015, 71 : 417 - 419
  • [5] Designing oversight for nanomedicine research in human subjects: systematic analysis of exceptional oversight for emerging technologies
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Jones, Cortney M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04) : 1449 - 1465
  • [6] Designing oversight for nanomedicine research in human subjects: systematic analysis of exceptional oversight for emerging technologies
    Susan M. Wolf
    Cortney M. Jones
    [J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2011, 13 : 1449 - 1465
  • [7] The History of Human Subjects Research and Rationale for Institutional Board Review Oversight
    Spellecy, Ryan
    Busse, Kristin
    [J]. NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 36 (03) : 560 - 567
  • [9] Institutional Review Board Oversight of Citizen Science Research Involving Human Subjects
    Resnik, David B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2019, 19 (08): : 21 - 23
  • [10] Recommendations for Nanomedicine Human Subjects Research Oversight: An Evolutionary Approach for an Emerging Field
    Fatehi, Leili
    Wolf, Susan M.
    McCullough, Jeffrey
    Hall, Ralph
    Lawrenz, Frances
    Kahn, Jeffrey P.
    Jones, Cortney
    Campbell, Stephen A.
    Dresser, Rebecca S.
    Erdman, Arthur G.
    Haynes, Christy L.
    Hoerr, Robert A.
    Hogle, Linda F.
    Keane, Moira A.
    Khushf, George
    King, Nancy M. P.
    Kokkoli, Efrosini
    Marchant, Gary
    Maynard, Andrew D.
    Philbert, Martin
    Ramachandran, Gurumurthy
    Siegel, Ronald A.
    Wickline, Samuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2012, 40 (04): : 716 - 750