A multifunctional approach for achieving simultaneous biodiversity conservation and farmer livelihood in coffee agroecosystems

被引:28
|
作者
Iverson, Aaron L. [1 ]
Gonthier, David J. [2 ,5 ]
Pak, Damie [1 ,6 ]
Ennis, Katherine K. [3 ]
Burnham, Robyn J. [1 ]
Perfecto, Ivette [2 ]
Rodriguez, Mariangie Ramos [4 ]
Vandermeer, John H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Environm Studies Dept, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[4] Univ Puerto Rico, Dept Tecnol Agr, Utuado, PR 00641 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Dept Entomol, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Agricultural management intensity; Biological control; Ecosystem services; Farm profit; Landscape composition; Tradeoffs and synergies; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PEST-CONTROL; AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; BERRY BORER; TRADE-OFFS; CERTIFICATION; LANDSCAPES; DIVERSITY; POLLINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.024
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecologically complex agroecosystems often provide multiple conservation benefits, yet understanding the agricultural practices that favor biodiversity is often a theoretical task until we simultaneously demonstrate the economic impact of such practices on farmers. We provide a multifunctional analysis of both biodiversity and ecosystem services that influence coffee farm profit in Puerto Rico. We show that the vegetation heterogeneity of an agroecosystem, more so than any one ecological component (e.g. shade), is associated with a higher biodiversity of plants, birds, lizards, bees, ants, and parasitoid wasps. However, a farm's vegetation heterogeneity does not consistently correlate with profit-related ecosystem services, including coffee yield and biological control of coffee pests and pathogens, due to tradeoffs between services. Therefore, inherent financial incentives that would encourage farmers to manage farms in ways that maintain high associated biodiversity may be lacking. We explored several economic incentives that would allow farms to be simultaneously biodiverse and profitable, which we show is possible through realistic incentive schemes. We found that the combination of a certification premium plus carbon payments (50% premium plus $16 t(-1) CO(2)e) or a restructuring of agricultural subsidies using currently experienced subsidy amounts may be sufficient to make farms that are more heterogeneous, and therefore more biodiverse, the most profitable option for farmers. If these biodiverse farms can also be profitable, it will open critical opportunities for maintaining rural landscapes that support farmers' livelihoods, as well as protect the planet's biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 7 条