InSAR and GPS inversion for source parameters of the 2016 Mw6. 4 Meinong, Taiwan earthquake

被引:13
|
作者
Wang Le-Yang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gao Hua [1 ,3 ]
Feng Guang-Cai [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Technol, Fac Geomat, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Sch Geosci & Infophys, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] NASG, Key Lab Watershed Ecol & Geog Environm Monitoring, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[4] Key Lab Digital Land & Resources Jiangxi Prov, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Meinong Taiwan earthquake; Inversion for seismic source parameters; InSAR; Co-seismic deformation field; PSO; JOINT INVERSION; DEFORMATION;
D O I
10.6038/cjg20170707
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On February 6, 2016, an M(w)6. 4 earthquake struck the Meinong district of Kaohsiung city in Taiwan, China. Many studies have been conducted on this event, most of which are based on seismic Data, while no consensus has been reached on its fault structure and focal parameters yet. Surface displacement obtained by InSAR technology is widely used in earthquake studies because of its high resolution and accuracy with large and continuous coverage. This study used InSAR and GPS data to investigate the focal mechanism and slip distribution of the 2016 Meinong earthquake. Using the dual-track differential interferometric SAR (D-InSAR) technology, we extracted the coseismic deformation field of this earthquake from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data (both the ascending and descending) acquired by satellite ALOS2 and the ascending data by satellite Sentinal-1A. The results show that the maximum deformation occurred in the west of the epicenter with an uplift around 11. 2 cm. The uniform dislocation model and multiple peak particle swarm optimization (MPSO) algorithm were employed to determine the fault geometry of this earthquake based on the InSAR and GPS data. The results show that the rupture is a reverse fault with sinistral strike-slip with the average slip angle of 51. 5 degrees. The deformation center is at 22. 920 degrees N, 120. 420 degrees E with a depth of 12 km. The rupture plane is about 15 km long with a strike of 307 degrees and a dip angle of 16. 5 degrees. The optimal dip angle (15. 7 degrees), weighting ratio (18 :1) between GPS and InSAR and the smoothing factor (0. 06) obtained by the grid iteration method based on a non-uniform dislocation model, and the non negative least squares method are used to determine the detailed slip distribution. The results show that the maximum value of dip slip and strike slip are 51. 7 and 55. 3 cm, respectively. The moment magnitude of the non-uniform rupture model is M(w)6. 38, slightly smaller than that of GCMT (M(w)6. 4). The comparison between our research and previous work and the analysis of the regional faults indicate that a single fault geometry is more reasonable which can fit both the GPS and InSAR data well. We also find that the ruptured fault is a blind structure located between the Zouchen and Chishan faults with an SE-NW strike, dipping toward to SE. We infer this fault should be also related with the 2010 M(W)6. 3 Jiashian earthquake.
引用
收藏
页码:2578 / 2588
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, Master Thesis.
  • [2] Deformation during the 12 November 1999 Duzce, Turkey, earthquake, from GPS and InSAR data
    Bürgmann, R
    Ayhan, ME
    Fielding, EJ
    Wright, TJ
    McClusky, S
    Aktug, B
    Demir, C
    Lenk, O
    Türkezer, A
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 92 (01) : 161 - 171
  • [3] Spatio-Temporal Error Sources Analysis and Accuracy Improvement in Landsat 8 Image Ground Displacement Measurements
    Ding, Chao
    Feng, Guangcai
    Li, Zhiwei
    Shan, Xinjian
    Du, Yanan
    Wang, Huiqiang
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (11):
  • [4] Coseismic Deformation of the 2015 Mw 6.4 Pishan, China, Earthquake Estimated from Sentinel-1A and ALOS2 Data
    Feng, Guangcai
    Li, Zhiwei
    Xu, Bing
    Shan, Xinjian
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhu, Jianjun
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 87 (04) : 800 - 806
  • [5] Geodetic model of the 2015 April 25 Mw 7.8 Gorkha Nepal Earthquake and Mw 7.3 aftershock estimated from InSAR and GPS data
    Feng, Guangcai
    Li, Zhiwei
    Shan, Xinjian
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhang, Guohong
    Zhu, Jianjun
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 203 (02) : 896 - 900
  • [6] Source parameters of the 2014 Mw 6.1 South Napa earthquake estimated from the Sentinel 1A, COSMO-SkyMed and GPS data
    Feng Guangcai
    Li Zhiwei
    Shan Xinjian
    Xu Bing
    Du Yanan
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2015, 655 : 139 - 146
  • [7] [冯万鹏 Feng Wanpeng], 2010, [地球物理学进展, Progress in Geophysiscs], V25, P1189
  • [8] Surface displacements and source parameters of the 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake from Envisat advanced synthetic aperture radar imagery
    Funning, GJ
    Parsons, B
    Wright, TJ
    Jackson, JA
    Fielding, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2005, 110 (B9) : 1 - 23
  • [9] Multiple fault slip triggered above the 2016 Mw 6.4 MeiNong earthquake in Taiwan
    Huang, Mong-Han
    Tung, Hsin
    Fielding, Eric J.
    Huang, Hsin-Hua
    Liang, Cunren
    Huang, Chung
    Hu, Jyr-Ching
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (14) : 7459 - 7467
  • [10] Joint inversion of seismic and geodetic data for the source of the 2010 March 4, Mw 6.3 Jia-Shian, SW Taiwan, earthquake
    Huang, Mong-Han
    Dreger, Douglas
    Buergmann, Roland
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    Hashimoto, Manabu
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 193 (03) : 1608 - 1626