A Randomized Trial of Acceptability and Effects of Values-Based Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Oncology: Person-Centered Oncologic Care and Choices

被引:24
|
作者
Epstein, Andrew S. [1 ,2 ]
O'Reilly, Eileen M. [1 ,2 ]
Shuk, Elyse [1 ]
Romano, Danielle [1 ]
Li, Yuelin [1 ]
Breitbart, William [1 ,2 ]
Volandes, Angelo E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Advance care planning; cancer; communication; goals; patient participation; OF-LIFE DISCUSSIONS; ADVANCED CANCER; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; SERIOUS ILLNESS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGIC DISTRESS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTERVENTION; THERAPY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.04.009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. No standard advance care planning (ACP) process exists in oncology. We previously developed and validated the values questions for Person-Centered Oncologic Care and Choices (P-COCC), a novel ACP intervention combining a patient values interview with an informational care goals video. Objectives. To pilot-study acceptability and, using randomization, explore potential utility of P-COCC. Methods. Eligibility included patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer cared for at a comprehensive cancer center. Participants were randomized 2: 2: 1 to P-COCC vs. video alone vs. usual care, respectively. Validated assessments of well-being and decisional conflict were completed. Participants in the P-COCC arm also completed three Likert scales (was the intervention helpful, comfortable, and recommended to others); a positive score of at least 1 of 3 indicated acceptability. Results. Patients were screened from 9/2014 to 11/2016; 151 were consented and randomized, 99 whom completed study measures (most common attrition reason: disease progression or death). The primary aim was met: Among 33 participants, P-COCC was acceptable to 32 (97%, 95% CI: 0.84e0.99, P < 0.001). Mean distress scores (0e10) increased (0.43) in the P-COCC arm but decreased in the video-alone (similar to 0.04) and usual-care (similar to 0.21) arms (P<1/4> 0.03 and 0.04, P-COCC vs. videoalone and usual-care arms, respectively). There were no significant pre-post change scores on other measures of well-being (e. g., anxiety, depression, stress) or intergroup differences in decisional conflict. Conclusion. Our values-based ACP paradigm is acceptable but may increase distress in cancer outpatients. Further studies are investigating the underpinnings of these effects and ways to best support cancer patients in ACP. (C) 2018 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A mixed methods analysis of patients' advance care planning values in outpatient oncology: Person-Centered Oncologic Care and Choices (P-COCC)
    Agarwal, Rajiv
    Shuk, Elyse
    Romano, Danielle
    Genoff, Margaux
    Li, Yuelin
    O'Reilly, Eileen M.
    Breitbart, William
    Volandes, Angelo E.
    Epstein, Andrew S.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (03) : 1109 - 1119
  • [2] A mixed methods analysis of patients’ advance care planning values in outpatient oncology: Person-Centered Oncologic Care and Choices (P-COCC)
    Rajiv Agarwal
    Elyse Shuk
    Danielle Romano
    Margaux Genoff
    Yuelin Li
    Eileen M. O’Reilly
    William Breitbart
    Angelo E. Volandes
    Andrew S. Epstein
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020, 28 : 1109 - 1119
  • [3] Development of an advance care planning paradigm for advanced cancer: person-centered oncologic care and choices (P-COCC)
    Epstein, Andrew S.
    O'Reilly, Eileen M.
    Shuk, Elyse
    Breitbart, William
    Shah, Maheen A.
    Ly, Michele
    Tayler, Rachel
    Volandes, Angelo E.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (06) : 866 - 869
  • [4] Acceptability and effects of values-based outpatient advance care planning (ACP) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.
    Epstein, Andrew S.
    O'Reilly, Eileen Mary
    Volandes, Angelo E.
    Shuk, Elyse
    Romano, Danielle R.
    Breitbart, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (31)
  • [5] Implementing Person-Centered Care Planning: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Stanhope, Victoria
    Choy-Brown, Mimi
    Williams, Nathaniel
    Marcus, Steven C.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2021, 72 (06) : 641 - 646
  • [6] Acceptability and effects of values-based outpatient advanced care planning (ACP) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers
    Epstein, Andrew S.
    O'Reilly, Eileen Mary
    Volandes, Angelo E.
    Li, Yuelin
    Shuk, Elyse
    Breitbart, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [7] Person-centered care planning and service engagement: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Stanhope, Victoria
    Tondora, Janis
    Davidson, Larry
    Choy-Brown, Mimi
    Marcus, Steven C.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [8] Person-centered care planning and service engagement: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Victoria Stanhope
    Janis Tondora
    Larry Davidson
    Mimi Choy-Brown
    Steven C Marcus
    [J]. Trials, 16
  • [9] TakingAIM A Precision Health Framework for Promoting Person-Centered Advance Care Planning
    Sullivan, Suzanne S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2019, 21 (06) : 502 - 509
  • [10] Using the Values-Based History to Fine-Tune Advance Care Planning for Oncology Patients
    Eric E. Prommer
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Education, 2010, 25 : 66 - 69