Combining Hydrologic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment Approaches to Evaluate Sustainability of Water Infrastructure

被引:0
|
作者
Tavakol-Davani, Hassan [1 ]
Burian, Steven J. [2 ]
Butler, David [3 ]
Sample, David [4 ]
Devkota, Jay [5 ]
Apul, Defne [6 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 110 Cent Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, North Pk Rd, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England
[4] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Hampton Rd Agr Res & Extens Ctr, Dept Biol Syst Engn, 1444 Diamond Springs Rd, Virginia Beach, VA 23455 USA
[5] Clemson Univ, Dept Civil Engn, S Palmetto Blvd, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[6] Univ Toledo, Dept Civil Engn, 2801 W Bancroft St,MS 307, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Combined sewer overflow; Hydrologic design; Life cycle assessment; Rainwater harvesting; Sustainability; Urban water; RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEMS; COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; DRINKING-WATER; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; DECISION-SUPPORT; TREATMENT PLANTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001340
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Designing urban water infrastructure systems for environmental sustainability requires consideration of hydrologic performance design criteria and results from life cycle assessment (LCA). The objective of this paper is to present a study of merging hydrologic and LCA criteria into the evaluation of the environmental sustainability of rainwater harvesting (RWH) to control combined sewer overflows (CSOs). A case study of the City of Toledo, Ohio combined sewer system serves as the platform to investigate the two approaches and to compare RWH with centralized gray infrastructure strategies for controlling CSOs. Results show that the four RWH scenarios studied (two RWH-only: one to supply toilet flushing demand and the other to serve as extended detention; and two hybrids based on combining the two previous with gray infrastructure) delivered higher combined sewage volumes to wastewater treatment facilities compared to a gray infrastructure-only scenario. This resulted in elevated life cycle global warming potential (GWP) impacts (1.10kg CO2e per 1m3 of reduced CSOs) on average for the four RWH scenarios. The gray infrastructure-only scenario reduced GWP impacts because it included sewer separation leading to lowered amounts of combined sewage volume treated (-1.89kgCO2e per 1m3 of reduced CSOs). But, due to the untreated stormwater discharges to receiving waters, the gray infrastructure-only scenario led to a higher ecotoxicity water (ETW) impact [-12.11 comparative toxic unit for ecotoxicity (CTU eco) per 1m3 of reduced CSOs] compared to the RWH scenarios (-19.62 CTU eco per 1m3 of reduced CSOs on average). In conclusion, the new watershed-scale LCA framework led to more information on the CSO control strategies compared to hydrologic-only analysis, but it created a more complicated decision. Information from Toledo water stakeholders must be taken into account before nominating a scenario as the one that globally outperforms the others according the multi-hydrologic-LCA criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining Hydrologic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment Approaches to Evaluate Sustainability of Water Infrastructure: Uncertainty Analysis
    Tavakol-Davani, Hassan
    Rahimi, Reyhaneh
    Burian, Steven J.
    Pomeroy, Christine A.
    McPherson, Brian J.
    Apul, Defne
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [2] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for manufacturing - analysis of existing approaches
    Schramm, Anika
    Richter, Fanny
    Goetze, Uwe
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - HAND IN HAND TO SUSTAINABILITY ON GLOBE, 2020, 43 : 712 - 719
  • [3] Life cycle assessment to evaluate the sustainability of urban agriculture: opportunities and challenges
    Mietz, Lena Katharina
    Civit, Barbara Maria
    Arena, Alejandro Pablo
    [J]. AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 48 (07) : 981 - 1005
  • [4] Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis Framing Questions for Approaches
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    Heijungs, Reinout
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (05) : 656 - 658
  • [5] The use of life cycle assessment for evaluating the sustainability of the Amsterdam water cycle
    Klaversma, E.
    van der Helm, A. W. C.
    Kappelhof, J. W. N. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 4 (02) : 103 - 109
  • [6] Modeling for sustainability: Life cycle assessment application to evaluate environmental performance of water recycling solutions at the dwelling level
    Zanni, Sara
    Cipolla, Sara Simona
    di Fusco, Emanuela
    Lenci, Alessandro
    Altobelli, Margherita
    Currado, Antonio
    Maglionico, Marco
    Bonoli, Alessandra
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2019, 17 : 47 - 61
  • [7] Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alkaline Water Electrolysis
    Hake, Juergen-Friedrich
    Koj, Jan Christian
    Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
    Schloer, Holger
    Schreiber, Andrea
    Wulf, Christina
    Zapp, Petra
    Ketelaer, Thomas
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105 : 3403 - 3410
  • [8] Life cycle sustainability assessment
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (04): : 373 - 376
  • [9] Life cycle sustainability assessment
    Alessandra Zamagni
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 373 - 376
  • [10] Use of life cycle assessment and water quality analysis to evaluate the environmental impacts of the bioremediation of polluted water
    Yao, Xiaochen
    Cao, Yun
    Zheng, Guodi
    Devlin, Adam T.
    Yu, Bao
    Hou, Xin
    Tang, Siwen
    Xu, Lingming
    Lu, Yuanhong
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 761