Spike-time-dependent plasticity rule in memristor models for circuit design

被引:4
|
作者
Elhamdaoui, Mouna [1 ]
Rziga, Faten Ouaja [1 ]
Mbarek, Khaoula [1 ]
Besbes, Kamel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Monastir, Microelect & Instrumentat Lab, Monastir, Tunisia
[2] Sousse Technol Pk, Ctr Res Microelect & Nanotechnol, Sousse, Tunisia
关键词
LTP; LTD; Memristor models; Neuromorphic systems; Plasticity; Synapse; STDP; RRAM DEVICES; SPICE MODEL; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s10825-022-01895-9
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Spike-time-dependent plasticity (STDP) represents an essential learning rule found in biological synapses and is recommended for replication in neuromorphic electronic systems. This rule is defined as a process of updating synaptic weight that depends on the time difference between the pre- and post-synaptic spikes. It is well known that pre-synaptic activity preceding post-synaptic activity may induce long-term potentiation (LTP), whereas the reverse case induces long-term depression (LTD). Memristors, which are two-terminal memory devices, are excellent candidates to implement such a mechanism due to their distinctive characteristics. In this article, we analyze the fundamental characteristics of three of the most known memristor models, and then, we simulate them in order to mimic the plasticity rule of biological synapses. The tested models are the linear ion drift model (HP), the Voltage ThrEshold Adaptive Memristor (VTEAM) model, and the Enhanced Generalized Memristor (EGM) model. We compare the I-V characteristics of these models with an experimental memristive device based on Ta2O5. We simulate and validate the STDP Hebbian learning algorithm proving the capability of each model to reproduce the conductance change for the LTP and LTD functions. Thus, our simulation results explore the most suitable model to operate as a synapse component for neuromorphic circuits.
引用
收藏
页码:1038 / 1047
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spike-time-dependent plasticity rule in memristor models for circuit design
    Mouna Elhamdaoui
    Faten Ouaja Rziga
    Khaoula Mbarek
    Kamel Besbes
    [J]. Journal of Computational Electronics, 2022, 21 : 1038 - 1047
  • [2] Reinforcement learning, spike-time-dependent plasticity, and the BCM rule
    Baras, Dorit
    Meir, Ron
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2007, 19 (08) : 2245 - 2279
  • [3] Perceptron learning rule derived from spike-frequency adaptation and spike-time-dependent plasticity
    D'Souza, Prashanth
    Liu, Shih-Chii
    Hahnloser, Richard H. R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (10) : 4722 - 4727
  • [4] Floating Gate Synapses With Spike-Time-Dependent Plasticity
    Ramakrishnan, Shubha
    Hasler, Paul E.
    Gordon, Christal
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2011, 5 (03) : 244 - 252
  • [5] Emergence of synfire chains with triphasic spike-time-dependent plasticity
    Amelia Waddington
    Peter A Appleby
    Marc deKamps
    Netta Cohen
    [J]. BMC Neuroscience, 12 (Suppl 1)
  • [6] The spike-time-dependent plasticity model of retrieval induced forgetting
    Sikstrom, Sverker
    Waldhauser, Gerd
    Johansson, Mikael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 571 - 571
  • [7] Understanding spike-time-dependent plasticity: A biologically motivated computational model
    Hartley, Matthew
    Taylor, Neill
    Taylor, John
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2006, 69 (16-18) : 2005 - 2016
  • [8] Self-organizing dual coding based on spike-time-dependent plasticity
    Masuda, N
    Aihara, K
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2004, 16 (03) : 627 - 663
  • [9] Self-Adaptive Spike-Time-Dependent Plasticity of Metal-Oxide Memristors
    Prezioso, M.
    Bayat, F. Merrikh
    Hoskins, B.
    Likharev, K.
    Strukov, D.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [10] Spike-Time-Dependent Encoding for Neuromorphic Processors
    Zhao, Chenyuan
    Wysocki, Bryant T.
    Liu, Yifang
    Thiem, Clare D.
    McDonald, Nathan R.
    Yi, Yang
    [J]. ACM JOURNAL ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2015, 12 (03)