Does Outcome Favorability Affect Procedural Fairness as a Result of Self-Serving Attributions?

被引:5
|
作者
Francis-Gladney, Laura [1 ]
Magner, Nace R. [2 ]
Welker, Robert B. [3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Technol Utica Rome, Inst Technol, Dept Accounting, Utica, NY 13504 USA
[2] Western Kentucky Univ, Bowling Green, KY 42101 USA
[3] So Illinois Univ, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
关键词
ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; REFERENT COGNITIONS; VOICE; EXPLANATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00569.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a situation indicating possible pseudo-participation, we examined whether outcome favorability affects perceived procedural fairness and resentment as a result of self-serving attributions for outcomes. Laboratory participants received a production target that was either substantially above (i.e., unfavorable outcome) or substantially below (i.e., favorable outcome) a target they had voiced to a supervisor. As hypothesized, outcome favorability was related to procedural fairness (positively) and resentment (negatively) among participants who lacked persuasive evidence of pseudo-participation. In support of the idea that these effects were a result of self-serving attributions, rather than instrumental concerns, they did not emerge among participants who had persuasive evidence of pseudo-participation.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 194
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条