Current Evidence of the Oncological Benefit-Risk Profile of Hormone Replacement Therapy

被引:45
|
作者
D'Alonzo, Marta [1 ]
Bounous, Valentina Elisabetta [1 ]
Villa, Michela [1 ]
Biglia, Nicoletta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Mauriziano Hosp, Acad Div Gynaecol & Obstet, I-10128 Turin, Italy
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2019年 / 55卷 / 09期
关键词
menopause; hormone; women's health; breast cancer; gynecological cancers; colon cancer; BREAST-CANCER INCIDENCE; ESTROGEN PLUS PROGESTIN; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; MORTALITY; DENSITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/medicina55090573
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) remains the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms and has been shown to prevent bone loss and fracture. The progestogen is added to provide endometrial protection in women with an intact uterus. After the publication of the initial WHI (Women's Health Initiative) results in 2002 reporting an overall increased risk of breast cancer, many women discontinued HRT. Despite the re-analysis of the results by subgroups of patients and updates with extended follow-up, much controversy remains, which we will analyze later in the text. Different types of estrogen or progestogen, as well as different formulations, doses, and durations, may play a role in HRT's effects on breast tissue. Evidence states that conjugated equine estrogen (CEE), compared to estro-progestin therapy, shows a better profile risk (HR 0.79, CI 0.65-0.97) and that, among different type of progestins, those structurally related to testosterone show a higher risk (RR 3.35, CI 1.07-10.4). Chronic unopposed endometrial exposure to estrogen increases the risk of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer, whereas the association with progestins, especially in continuous combined regimen, seems to reduce the risk (RR 0.71, CI 0.56-0.90). HRT was also associated with a protective effect on colon cancer risk (HR 0.61, CI 0.42-0.87). Data about ovarian and cervical cancer are still controversial.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefit-risk analysis of hormone replacement therapy
    Leidenberger, FA
    GYNAKOLOGE, 1997, 30 (04): : 314 - 325
  • [2] Hormone replacement therapy in a risk benefit perspective
    Shah, D
    SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, VOL II: RECENT ADVANCES, FUTURE DIRECTIONS, 2001, : 435 - 441
  • [4] Benefit-risk ratios in the assessment of the clinical evidence of a new therapy
    Willan, AR
    OBrien, BJ
    Cook, DJ
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 18 (02): : 121 - 130
  • [5] HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY - BENEFIT, RISK AND COST CONSIDERATIONS
    TOSTESON, ANA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 34 (07): : 719 - 722
  • [6] Atherosclerosis and hormone replacement therapy. Benefit or risk
    Mueck, AO
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2002, 35 (10): : 965 - 974
  • [7] Hormone replacement therapy in a risk-benefit perspective
    Daly, E
    Vessey, MP
    Barlow, D
    Gray, A
    McPherson, K
    Roche, M
    MATURITAS, 1996, 23 (02) : 247 - 259
  • [8] Benefit-risk profile of new inhalation anesthetics
    Conzen, P
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2001, 36 (06): : 362 - 365
  • [9] Benefit-Risk Assessment of Current Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation
    Hohnloser, Stefan H.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 35 : S28 - S32
  • [10] Qualitative/quantitative descriptors of risk and benefit of hormone replacement therapy
    Michaud, G
    Berthiaume, L
    Debalays, E
    McGowan, J
    O'Connor, A
    Jolly, E
    Wells, G
    Elmslie, T
    Tugwell, P
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1998, 41 (09): : S134 - S134