Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska

被引:2
|
作者
O'Connor, Bryan J. [1 ]
Fryda, Nicolas J. [2 ]
Ranglack, Dustin H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Kearney, Dept Biol, Kearney, NE 68849 USA
[2] Nebraska Game & Pk Commis, Kearney, NE USA
来源
PEERJ | 2018年 / 6卷
关键词
Mule deer; Hunting; NDVI; Roads; Nebraska; Terrain roughness; Canopy cover; Harvest; Hunter effort; WHITE-TAILED DEER; RESOURCE SELECTION FUNCTIONS; CONTERMINOUS UNITED-STATES; INFORMATION; DENSITY; HUNTERS; SUCCESS; MODEL; ELK;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.5510
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Understanding the habitat use of wildlife species is important for effective management. Nebraska has a variety of habitat types, with the majority being covered by rangeland and cropland. These habitat types likely influence the harvest of mule deer (MD; Odocoileus hemionus) in Nebraska, but their specific effects are unknown, and moreover, harvest may also be influenced by the accessibility of deer habitats for hunters. We modeled which environmental and anthropogenic landscape features influenced harvest densities. Spatial analysis in a Geographic Information System was used to determine the mean values of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features at the county level. We then used a generalized linear model to determine which of those factors influenced MD harvest from 2014-2016. We found that NDVI amplitude, hunter effort, road density, terrain roughness, and canopy cover influence MD harvest in Nebraska. According to our model, MD harvest densities are significantly greater areas with NDVI amplitude similar to 38, increasing hunter effort, road densities near 1,750 m/km(2), increasing terrain roughness, and decreasing canopy cover. Understanding increased harvest densities of MD can be beneficial for wildlife managers, allowing for more efficient allocation of efforts and expenses by managers for population management.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Landscape and anthropogenic features influence the use of auditory vigilance by mule deer
    Lynch, Emma
    Northrup, Joseph M.
    McKenna, Megan F.
    Anderson, Charles R., Jr.
    Angeloni, Lisa
    Wittemyer, George
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 26 (01) : 75 - 82
  • [2] MULE DEER IN NEBRASKA NATIONAL FOREST
    MOHLER, LL
    WAMPOLE, JH
    FICHTER, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1951, 15 (02): : 129 - 157
  • [3] Estimating mule deer harvest in southwestern Idaho
    Unsworth, JW
    Johnson, NF
    Nelson, LJ
    Miyasaki, HM
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2002, 30 (02): : 487 - 491
  • [4] Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: Effects on spatial distribution of mule deer
    Kie, JG
    Bowyer, RT
    Nicholson, MC
    Boroski, BB
    Loft, ER
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2002, 83 (02) : 530 - 544
  • [5] Mule deer and anthropogenic change: effects of agricultural encroachment on movement, morphology, and population performance
    Heffelfinger, Levi J.
    Hewitt, David G.
    Gray, Shawn S.
    Fulbright, Timothy E.
    DeYoung, Randy W.
    Foley, Aaron M.
    Harveson, Louis A.
    Conway, Warren C.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA FISH AND WILDLIFE JOURNAL, 2022, 108 (03):
  • [6] CEREBRAL ABSCESS AND CEPHENEMYIA-PHOBIFER IN A MULE DEER IN CENTRAL NEBRASKA
    JOHNSON, JL
    CAMPBELL, JB
    DOSTER, AR
    NASON, G
    CAGNE, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1983, 19 (03) : 279 - 280
  • [7] An evaluation of mule deer harvest estimates on the North Kaibab, Arizona
    Munig, AA
    Wakeling, B
    [J]. Colorado Plateau II: Biophysical, Socioeconomic, and Cultural Research, 2005, : 293 - 296
  • [8] PREDICTING MULE DEER HARVEST IN MIDDLE-PARK, COLORADO
    FREDDY, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1982, 46 (03): : 801 - 806
  • [9] Environmental sources of prion transmission in mule deer
    Miller, MW
    Williams, ES
    Hobbs, NT
    Wolfe, LL
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 10 (06) : 1003 - 1006
  • [10] Rapid acquisition of memory in a complex landscape by a mule deer
    Jakopak, Rhiannon P.
    Lasharr, Ayler N.
    Dwinnell, Samantha P. H.
    Fralick, Gary L.
    Monteith, Kevin L.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2019, 100 (12)