Characteristics of Engineering Faculty Engaged in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Bielefeldt, Angela R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
engineering faculty; demographics; disciplines; service-learning; ethics; design; culture; EDUCATION; WOMEN; CULTURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This research hypothesized that differences in the culture of engineering education as it is practiced a whole, as compared to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) in engineering education, would manifest themselves through the characteristics of the faculty engaging in these activities. The research question examined was: To what extent are the faculty who engage in different areas of SoTL research within engineering similar to or different than the engineering faculty at U.S. institutions overall? The research utilized a data mining approach, assuming that the authors of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference papers would characterize engineering faculty engaged in SoTL. The demographic characteristics of the authors of ASEE papers published in 2012-2014 on the topics of Learning Through Service (LTS), engineering ethics, and design were determined, as well as the authors of papers in the civil engineering, environmental engineering, and electrical & computer engineering divisions. The demographic characteristics of engineering faculty nationally were mined from ASEE data sources. The primary differences between engineering faculty active in SoTL compared to overall U.S. engineering faculty were: a higher percentage of assistant professors, a lower percentage of full professors, a higher percentage of women, a higher percentage employed at Baccalaureate or Master's institutions, and a smaller percentage from institutions with very high research activity. Between different engineering education topics, the primary differences were in the engineering disciplines represented, the percentage of women among the authors, and collaboration patterns evident among the paper coauthors. These data indicate the ways in which engineering faculty active in SoTL are different than their engineering faculty peers overall, and also highlights differences among engineering education topics. Further exploration is needed to determine the extent to which these differences are the result of different cultural values within each group.
引用
收藏
页码:1146 / 1153
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scholarly Teaching and Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Teaching Engineering
    Ruutmann, Tiia
    Saar, Merike
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON2017), 2017, : 213 - 218
  • [2] What Determines Faculty-Engaged Scholarship?
    Vogelgesang, Lori J.
    Denson, Nida
    Jayakumar, Uma M.
    REVIEW OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 33 (04): : 437 - +
  • [3] Faculty 2.0: Embedding the scholarship of teaching and learning in future faculty development.
    Coppola, BP
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 222 : U401 - U401
  • [4] Faculty Learning Processes: A Model for Moving from Scholarly Teaching to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
    Gayle, Barbara M.
    Randall, Nancy
    Langley, Lin
    Preiss, Raymond
    TEACHING & LEARNING INQUIRY-THE ISSOTL JOURNAL, 2013, 1 (01): : 81 - 93
  • [5] The scholarship of teaching and learning: A Special Niche for Faculty at Comprehensive Universities?
    Bruce B. Henderson
    Heidi E. Buchanan
    Research in Higher Education, 2007, 48 : 523 - 543
  • [6] The scholarship of teaching and learning: A special niche for faculty at comprehensive universities?
    Henderson, Bruce B.
    Buchanan, Heidi E.
    RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2007, 48 (05) : 523 - 543
  • [7] Analysis of A Faculty of Engineering Concern on Teaching and Learning
    Meerah, T. Subahan Mohd
    6TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION (IFEE 2012), 2013, 102 : 158 - 163
  • [8] Faculty assessment and the scholarship of teaching and learning: Knowledge available/knowledge needed
    Lucal, B
    Albers, C
    Ballantine, J
    Burmeister-May, J
    Chin, J
    Dettmer, S
    Larson, S
    TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 2003, 31 (02) : 146 - 161
  • [9] Faculty and Student Partnerships in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Evaluation of an Institutional Model
    Moghtader, Bruce
    Briseno-Garzon, Adriana
    Varao-Sousa, Trish
    Roll, Ido
    TEACHING & LEARNING INQUIRY-THE ISSOTL JOURNAL, 2022, 10
  • [10] Using a scholarship of teaching and learning approach to award faculty who innovate
    Willingham-McLain, Laurel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 20 (01) : 58 - 75