Ultrasound-assisted Synthesis of Biodiesel from Crude Cottonseed Oil Using Response Surface Methodology

被引:21
|
作者
Fan, Xiaohu [2 ]
Chen, Feng [2 ]
Wang, Xi [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Biochem & Genet, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
biodiesel; central composite rotatable design (CCRD); crude cottonseed oil; response surface methodology (RSM); ultrasonic irradiation; VEGETABLE-OILS; FATTY-ACIDS; SOYBEAN OIL; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSESTERIFICATION; ESTERS;
D O I
10.5650/jos.59.235
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Response surface methodology (RSM) based on central composite rotatable design (CCRD) was used to optimize the three important reaction variables-methanol/oil molar ratio (M), NaOH catalyst concentration (C) and reaction time (T) for transesterification of crude cottonseed oil under ultrasonic irradiation. A quadratic polynomial model was obtained to predict the methyl ester yield. 98 wt% of the methyl ester yield could be reached at the deduced optimal conditions: methanol/oil molar raito of 6.2:1, NaOH catalyst concentration of 1 wt% (by the weight of crude cottonseed oil) and reaction time of 8 min. Validation experiments confirmed the validity of the predicted model. Moreover, ultrasonic irradiation was proved to be an efficient, energy saving and economically feasible way to produce biodiesel.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of biodiesel from peanut oil by using response surface methodology
    Shalmashi, A.
    Khodadadi, F.
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 30 (02) : 272 - 291
  • [2] Optimization of Biodiesel Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis from Castor Oil Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
    Sabzimaleki, Mohammadreza
    Ghobadian, Barat
    Farsibaf, Mohsen Mazloom
    Najafi, Gholamhassan
    Soufi, Masoud Dehghani
    Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad Safieddin
    [J]. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELING, 2015, 10 (02): : 123 - 133
  • [3] An ultrasound-assisted system for the optimization of biodiesel production from chicken fat oil using a genetic algorithm and response surface methodology
    Fayyazi, E.
    Ghobadian, B.
    Najafi, G.
    Hosseinzadeh, B.
    Mamat, R.
    Hosseinzadeh, J.
    [J]. ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 26 : 312 - 320
  • [4] Ultrasonically Assisted Production of Biodiesel from Crude Cottonseed Oil
    Fan, Xiaohu
    Wang, Xi
    Chen, Feng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2010, 7 (02) : 117 - 127
  • [5] Optimization of ultrasound-assisted hexane extraction of perilla oil using response surface methodology
    Li, Hui-Zhen
    Zhang, Zhi-Jun
    Hou, Tian-Yu
    Li, Xiao-Jun
    Chen, Tie
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2015, 76 : 18 - 24
  • [6] The Study of Ultrasound-Assisted Enzymatic Extraction of Oil From Peanut Seeds Using Response Surface Methodology
    Heidari, Samira Haji
    Dinani, Somayeh Taghian
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LIPID SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 120 (03)
  • [7] Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Spent Coffee Grounds Oil Using Response Surface Methodology
    Miladi, Malek
    Martins, Antonio A.
    Mata, Teresa M.
    Vegara, Miguel
    Perez-Infantes, Maria
    Remmani, Rania
    Ruiz-Canales, Antonio
    Nunez-Gomez, Damaris
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (11)
  • [8] Optimization of ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction of walnut kernel oil using response surface methodology
    Ghasemi, Yasamin Zahra
    Dinani, Somayeh Taghian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2018, 41 (05)
  • [9] Comparison of response surface methodology and artificial neural network approach towards efficient ultrasound-assisted biodiesel production from muskmelon oil
    Maran, J. Prakash
    Priya, B.
    [J]. ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 23 : 192 - 200
  • [10] Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Oil from Canola Seeds with the Use of Response Surface Methodology
    Jalili, Farshid
    Jafari, Seid Mahdi
    Emam-Djomeh, Zahra
    Malekjani, Narjes
    Farzaneh, Vahid
    [J]. FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2018, 11 (02) : 598 - 612