UR here: The Supreme Court's guide for managed care

被引：5

|

作者：

Sage, WM ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA

来源：

HEALTH AFFAIRS | 2000年 / 19卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.219

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

收藏

页码：219 / 223

页数：5

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] Back to the 90's - The Supreme Court immunizes managed care
Bloche, MG
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (13): : 1277 - 1279
[2] The Supreme Court and managed-care liability
Zinberg, JM
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (02): : 202 - 202
[3] The Supreme Court has decided: There's a cap on managed-care liability
Coates-Conroy, J
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 96 (12) : 1542 - 1542
[4] The Supreme Court's view of the managed care industry's liability for adverse patient outcomes
Jacobson, PD
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (12): : 1516 - 1516
[5] Legal issues in medicine: The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability
Mariner, WK
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (13): : 1347 - 1352
[6] The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations
Jost, TS
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2004, 23 (05) : W417 - W426
[7] Here Lies the Supreme Court: Revisited
Christensen, George A.
JOURNAL OF SUPREME COURT HISTORY, 2008, 33 (01) : 17 - 41
[8] Here's looking at you - Does the Supreme Court value privacy?
Rosen, J
NEW REPUBLIC, 2000, 223 (16) : 24 - +
[9] Pegram v. Herdrich: The Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care
Appelbaum, PS
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2000, 51 (10) : 1225 - +
[10] The US Supreme Court and medical ethics: From contraception to managed health care
Rosoff, AJ
JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2005, 26 (02) : 303 - 309

← 1 2 3 4 5 →