Towards bridging the reality gap between tensegrity simulation and robotic hardware

被引:0
|
作者
Mirletz, Brian T. [1 ]
Park, In-Won [2 ]
Quinn, Roger D. [1 ]
SunSpiral, Vytas [3 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Biologically Inspired Robot Lab, Cleveland, OH 44016 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Associated Univ, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[3] SGT Inc, Greenbelt, MD USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Using a new hardware implementation of our designs for tunably compliant spine-like tensegrity robots, we show that the NASA Tensegrity Robotics Toolkit can effectively generate and predict desirable locomotion strategies for these many degree of freedom systems. Tensegrity, which provides structural integrity through a tension network, shows promise as a design strategy for more compliant robots capable of interaction with rugged environments, such as a tensegrity interplanetary probe prototype surviving multi-story drops. Due to the complexity of tensegrity structures, modeling through physics simulation and machine learning improves our ability to design and evaluate new structures and their controllers in a dynamic environment. The kinematics of our simulator, the open source NASA Tensegrity Robotics Toolkit, have been previously validated within 1.3% error on position through motion capture of the six strut robot ReCTeR. This paper provides additional validation of the dynamics through the direct comparison of the simulator to forces experienced by the latest version of the Tetraspine robot. These results give us confidence in our strategy of using tensegrity to impart future robotic systems with properties similar to biological systems such as increased flexibility, power, and mobility in extreme terrains.
引用
收藏
页码:5357 / 5363
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bridging the Gap Between Simulation and Reality
    Hanna, Josiah P.
    [J]. AAMAS'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2017, : 1834 - 1835
  • [2] Towards Bridging a Gap between Simulation and Experiment
    Marepalli, Prabhakar
    Li, Fengyuan Thomas
    Clark, Jason V.
    [J]. NANOTECHNOLOGY 2011: ELECTRONICS, DEVICES, FABRICATION, MEMS, FLUIDICS AND COMPUTATIONAL, NSTI-NANOTECH 2011, VOL 2, 2011, : 627 - 630
  • [3] Bridging the gap between simulation and reality in urban search and rescue
    Carpin, Stefano
    Lewis, Mike
    Wang, Jijun
    Balakirsky, Steve
    Scrapper, Chris
    [J]. ROBOCUP 2006: ROBOT SOCCER WORLD CUP X, 2007, 4434 : 1 - +
  • [4] Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care
    Andrade, Adriano O.
    Pereira, Adriano A.
    Walter, Steffen
    Almeida, Rosimary
    Loureiro, Rui
    Compagna, Diego
    Kyberd, Peter J.
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2014, 10 : 65 - 78
  • [5] Bridging the reality gap
    Anderson, SG
    [J]. LASER FOCUS WORLD, 2005, 41 (03): : 5 - 5
  • [6] BRIDGING THE REALITY GAP
    MATHEWSGENTRY, J
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1980, 60 (07): : 912 - 913
  • [7] Projective virtual reality: Bridging the gap between virtual reality and robotics
    Freund, E
    Rossmann, J
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1999, 15 (03): : 411 - 422
  • [8] THOMAS AQUINAS ON BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN MIND AND REALITY
    Baltuta, Elena
    [J]. REVUE ROUMAINE DE PHILOSOPHIE, 2012, 56 (01): : 147 - 160
  • [9] CONFERENCE SUCCEEDS IN BRIDGING GAP BETWEEN IDEAS AND REALITY
    RODDEN, G
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 1985, 86 (08) : 38 - 40
  • [10] BRIDGING THE HARDWARE SOFTWARE GAP
    ELMS, D
    [J]. MACHINE DESIGN, 1983, 55 (23) : 150 - 150