Pro-poor governance in water and sanitation service delivery: evidence from Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking Water surveys

被引:6
|
作者
Fuente, D. [1 ]
Bartram, J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Sch Earth Ocean & Environm, 701 Sumter St,EWS 617, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Water Inst, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
water; sanitation; international health; policy; Sustainable Development Goals; inequalities;
D O I
10.1177/1757913918788109
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) for water and sanitation seeks to achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water and access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene. This article examines what governments are doing to achieve this, paying particular attention to actions that governments report taking to better serve the poor and other vulnerable populations (i.e. pro-poor governance). This article also assesses the extent to which, and how, UN-Water's Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking Water (GLAAS) has tracked governments' efforts to reach the poor since the inception of this global monitoring effort. Method: This article employs qualitative document analysis and iterative coding to identify pro-poor governance themes examined in GLAAS reports from 2008 to 2016 and provides a quantitative summary of findings related to pro-poor governance from the most recent GLAAS surveys. Results: The dimensions of pro-poor governance and number of questions related to pro-poor governance in GLAAS surveys have increased from 2008 to 2016. While the majority of countries report taking actions to promote equity, many countries did not provide information about specific actions they were taking to provide better services to the poor. Moreover, several actions countries reported taking (e.g. implementing an increasing block tariff) are likely to be ineffective. Conclusion: The findings of this study raise concerns about the extent to which governments are taking - or are positioned to take - effective action to meet the SDG aspiration of safe and affordable water and sanitation services for all. Without information on what countries are doing to promote equity, policy makers and researchers are unable to discern which policies are effective in different contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 269
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pro-poor strategies for urban water supply and sanitation services delivery in Africa
    Cross, P
    Morel, A
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 51 (08) : 51 - 57
  • [2] Pro-poor water and sanitation: operationalising inclusive discourses to benefit the poor
    dos Santos, Raquel
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 24 : 30 - 35
  • [3] Delivering pro-poor water and sanitation services: The technical and political challenges in Malawi and Zambia
    Gutierrez, Eric
    GEOFORUM, 2007, 38 (05) : 886 - 900
  • [4] A systematic assessment of the pro-poor reach of development bank investments in urban sanitation
    Hutchings, P.
    Johns, M.
    Jornet, D.
    Scott, C.
    Van den Bossche, Z.
    JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 8 (03) : 402 - 414
  • [5] Implementing pro-poor policies in a decentralized context: the case of the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Program in Tanzania
    Jimenez Fernandez de Palencia, Alejandro
    Perez-Foguet, Agusti
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [6] Implementing pro-poor policies in a decentralized context: the case of the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Program in Tanzania
    Alejandro Jiménez Fernández de Palencia
    Agustí Pérez-Foguet
    Sustainability Science, 2011, 6 : 37 - 49
  • [7] Hybrid Water Rights Systems for Pro-Poor Water Governance in Africa
    Schreiner, Barbara
    van Koppen, Barbara
    WATER, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [8] Compositional data for global monitoring: The case of drinking water and sanitation
    Perez-Foguet, A.
    Gine-Garriga, R.
    Ortego, M. I.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 590 : 554 - 565
  • [9] Is the Distribution of Ecosystem Service Benefits Pro-Poor? Evidence from Water Purification by Forests in Thailand
    Vincent, Jeffrey R.
    Nabangchang, Orapan
    Shi, Congjie
    WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2020, 6 (03)
  • [10] Transparency, governance, and water and sanitation: Experimental evidence from schools in rural Bangladesh
    Allakulov, Umrbek
    Cocciolo, Serena
    Das, Binayak
    Habib, Md Ahasan
    Rambjer, Lovisa
    Tompsett, Anna
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2023, 163