Assessment of CO2 capture technologies for CO2 utilization in enhanced oil recovery

被引:5
|
作者
Ogidiama, Oghare Victor [1 ]
Shamim, Tariq [2 ]
机构
[1] Khalifa Univ Sci & Technol, Masdar Inst, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Northern Illinois Univ, Mech Engn, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
关键词
Aspen plus; capture cost; chemical looping combustion; CO2; capture; enhanced oil recovery;
D O I
10.1002/ghg.2057
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
CO2 capture is considered to be a viable means of reducing the harmful environmental impacts of the fossil fuel usage. The net cost of CO2 capture can be reduced and, consequently, the adoption of CO2 capture methods can be enhanced by developing revenue streams for the captured CO2. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR), which is the process of withdrawing crude from oil reservoirs after primary and secondary withdrawal, is viewed as an attractive means of CO2 utilization. The EOR process has the capacity to take large volumes of CO2 captured from power plants and use them for the production of incremental oil. The process which is known as CO2-EOR has synergistic benefits for the oil and gas and power generation industries. Different CO2 capture technologies are currently being used and their suitability of supplying captured CO2 for utilization in EOR may not be similar. This study analyzes the ease of utilization of CO2 captured from power plants in EOR applications. The analysis is done by comparing different capture technologies in terms of cost and purity of CO2 captured and their suitability of integration with the EOR. The results determine that the post-combustion CO2 capture is the most EOR friendly technique in terms of CO2 stream purity, while the chemical looping combustion (CLC) is the most EOR amenable in terms of the capture cost. The results show that the CO2 capture efforts from power plants using CLC can be fully covered by additional oil revenue at oil prices above $27.9 per barrel ($175.5/m(3)). (c) 2021 The Authors. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 444
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of enhanced activity of co-integration pathways for CO2 capture and CO2 utilization
    Maniarsu, R.
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 34 (08) : 3553 - 3567
  • [2] CO2 Utilization from "Next Generation" CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology
    Kuuskraa, Vello A.
    Godec, Michael L.
    Dipietro, Phil
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 6854 - 6866
  • [3] On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 - Enhanced oil recovery
    Farajzadeh, R.
    Eftekhari, A. A.
    Dafnomilis, G.
    Lake, L. W.
    Bruining, J.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 261
  • [4] CO2 CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES
    Gutierrez-Cerezales, Pablo
    Burgos-Rodriguez, Silvia
    Vigil-Montano, Ma Reyes
    [J]. DYNA, 2014, 89 (04): : 360 - 365
  • [5] CO2 Foam and CO2 Polymer Enhanced Foam for Heavy Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage
    Telmadarreie, Ali
    Trivedi, Japan J.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
  • [6] CO2 capture and utilization
    Anaya, Amanda M.
    Dillon, David L.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [7] On the Integration of CO2 Capture Technologies for an Oil Refinery
    Fetisov, Vadim
    Gonopolsky, Adam M. M.
    Zemenkova, Maria Yu.
    Andrey, Schipachev
    Davardoost, Hadi
    Mohammadi, Amir H. H.
    Riazi, Masoud
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (02)
  • [8] Storing CO2 with Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Ferguson, Robert C.
    Nichols, Christopher
    Van Leeuwen, Tyler
    Kuuskraa, Vello A.
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1989 - 1996
  • [9] Risk Assessment for future CO2 Sequestration Projects Based CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery in the US
    Duncan, Ian J.
    Nicot, Jean-Philippe
    Choi, Jong-Won
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 2037 - 2042
  • [10] Opportunities for Using Anthropogenic CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage
    Godec, Michael L.
    Kuuskraa, Vello A.
    Dipietro, Phil
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (08) : 4183 - 4189