Incidental Findings on CT for Suspected Renal Colic in Emergency Department Patients: Prevalence and Types in 5,383 Consecutive Examinations

被引:38
|
作者
Sarnim, Mohammad [1 ]
Goss, Sarah [2 ]
Luty, Seth [2 ]
Weinreb, Jeffiey [1 ]
Moore, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Incidental findings; CT; renal colic; ACUTE FLANK PAIN; EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS; WHITE PAPER; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; COMMITTEE II; PELVIC CT; COLONOGRAPHY; MRI; UROLITHIASIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.026
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the prevalence, importance, and types of incidental findings (IF) in non-enhanced CT scans performed for suspected renal colic, based on ACR white papers and other accepted radiographic recommendations. Methods: Retrospective review of 5,383 consecutive finalized reports of nonenhanced CT using renal colic protocol performed on adult patients at 2 emergency departments over a 5.5-year period. IF were defined as those unrelated to symptoms (as opposed to alternate causes of symptoms) and were categorized as "important" if follow-up was recommended based on recently published consensus recommendations. Subsets of reports of those with important IF were blindly re-reviewed to calculate inter-rater variability for presence and categorization of important IF. Results: Important IF were identified in 12.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.8%-13.6%) of scans. Prevalence of important IF increased with age: important IF in individuals age >80 years were 4 times more common than for those aged 18-30 years: 28.9% (95% CI: 22.4%-36.4%) versus 6.9% (95% CI: 5.5%-8.6%), respectively, P <= .05. Women had a higher prevalence of important IF compared with men: 13.4% (95% CI: 12.2%-14.7%) versus 11.9% (95% CI: 10.7%-13.2%), but the difference was not statically significant (P = .09). There was substantial inter-rater agreement (kappa >= 0.69) regarding presence and classification of important IFs using published guidelines. Conclusions: Important IF occurred in 12.7% of non-enhanced CT scans performed for suspected renal colic in the emergency department and are more common in older individuals. Prospective studies that use radiographic recommendations to characterize IF and examine the outcome and cost of their workup are encouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Cumulative CT exposures in emergency department patients evaluated for suspected renal colic
    Broder, Joshua
    Bowen, Josie
    Lohr, Jeffrey
    Babcock, Andrew
    Yoon, Jungyeon
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 33 (02): : 161 - 168
  • [2] Bedside Renal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Renal Colic
    Moak, J. H.
    Lindsell, C. J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 52 (04) : S62 - S62
  • [3] Ultrasound findings in renal colic patients referring to the emergency department
    Hosseininejad, Seyed Mohammad
    Sazgar, Mohammad
    Assadi, Touraj
    Ahidashti, Hamed Amini
    Mousavi, Seyed Jabber
    Sarhangi, Firoozeh Sadeghi
    Jahanian, Fatemeh
    Tirandaz, Fateme
    BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 16 (04): : 3686 - 3690
  • [4] Evaluation of Suspected Renal Colic with Noncontrast CT in the Emergency Department: A Single Institution Study
    Cullen, Ivor M.
    Cafferty, Fergus
    Oon, Sheng F.
    Manecksha, Rustom
    Shields, Darragh
    Grainger, Ron
    McDermott, T. E. D.
    Plunkett, Patrick
    Meaney, Jim
    Lynch, Thomas H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (11) : 2441 - 2445
  • [5] Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical CT for suspected renal colic: Experience with 1000 consecutive examinations
    Katz, DS
    Scheer, MS
    Lumerman, JH
    Mellinger, BC
    Stillman, CA
    Lane, MJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 473 - 473
  • [6] Benefits of CT urography in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected ureteric colic
    Ulahannan, D.
    Blakeley, C. J.
    Jeyadevan, N.
    Hashemi, K.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2008, 25 (09) : 569 - 571
  • [7] The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on emergency department abdominal CT scans.
    Messersmith, WA
    Brown, DFM
    Barry, MJ
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 : 83 - 83
  • [8] Usefulness of Corticomedullary-Phase CT Urography in Patients with Suspected Acute Renal Colic Visiting the Emergency Department
    Lee, Seokyoung
    Park, Yang Shin
    Park, Bitna
    Lee, Jongmee
    Choi, Jae Woong
    Kim, Kyeong Ah
    Lee, Chang Hee
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 84 (04): : 923 - 933
  • [9] RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH UROLOGIC INTERVENTION IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED RENAL COLIC
    Yan, Justin W.
    McLeod, Shelley L.
    Edmonds, Marcia L.
    Sedran, Robert J.
    Theakston, Karl D.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (02): : 130 - 135
  • [10] Impact in the emergency department of unenhanced CT on diagnostic confidence and therapeutic efficacy in patients with suspected renal colic: A prospective survey
    Abramson, S
    Walders, N
    Applegate, KE
    Gilkeson, RC
    Robbin, MR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (06) : 1689 - 1695