Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Seedling Growth Response to Site Preparation Tillage on Upland Sites

被引:5
|
作者
Furtado, Bruno F. [1 ]
Morris, Lawrence A. [2 ]
Markewitz, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Newfields Brazil, 282 Rua Joao Pessoa, BR-93410120 Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; UPPER COASTAL-PLAIN; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PIEDMONT; SOILS; ESTABLISHMENT; SURVIVAL; GEORGIA;
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2015.06.0243
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Mechanical site preparation has been considered essential to southern pine plantation establishment since the 1950s. Although survival and early growth responses to site preparation are well documented, several factors often contribute to these responses, and the specific contribution of soil tillage is not well established. Soil moisture content, soil resistance to penetration, and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) growth were measured on eight sites in the Upper Coastal Plain (UCP) and Piedmont in tilled (T) and nontilled (NT) rows under three conditions: operational site preparation with initial vegetation control (O), operational plus annual fertilization (O+F), and operational plus annual fertilization and complete vegetation control (O+F+V). Tillage reduced average soil resistance to penetration by 9 to 51% across cultural treatments. Soil tillage also reduced volumetric water content. On the most affected site, T rows contained 68% of the water of NT rows in the 0.15to 0.30-m interval and 53% of the water in the 0.30-to 0.60-m interval. Tillage resulted in positive growth responses on seven of the eight sites, and growth increases occurred across all cultural treatments. After two growing seasons, the largest trees were on a Lucy series soil where the O+F+V treatment resulted in an average stem volume index (SVI) of 8932 cm(3). The smallest trees were on a clayey Faceville series soil where the NT rows in the O treatment had an average SVI of 101 cm(3). Growth responses were poorly correlated with measured differences in average resistance or differences in resistance between T and NT rows in any depth increment (0-0.15, 0.150.30, or 0.30-0.60 m); however, soil resistance in the 0-to 0.15-m depth increment demarcated an upper bound for growth. A tillage effect on the volume of soil below a critical soil resistance was helpful for explaining some of the observed responses.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 489
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anatomy of seedling tap roots of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Daryl E. Enstone
    Carol A. Peterson
    Stephen W. Hallgren
    [J]. Trees, 2001, 15 : 98 - 111
  • [2] Anatomy of seedling tap roots of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Enstone, DE
    Peterson, CA
    Hallgren, SW
    [J]. TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION, 2001, 15 (02): : 98 - 111
  • [3] Soil change and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) seedling growth following site preparation tillage in the Upper Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States
    Lincoln, M. Chad
    Will, Rodney E.
    Morris, Lawrence A.
    Carter, Emily A.
    Markewitz, Daniel
    Britt, John R.
    Cazell, Ben
    Ford, Vic
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 242 (2-3) : 558 - 568
  • [4] Dynamic site model for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the United States
    Dieguez-Aranda, Ulises
    Burkhart, Harold E.
    Amateis, Ralph L.
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (03) : 262 - 272
  • [5] Estimation of carrying capacity in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Yang, Sheng-I
    Burkhart, Harold E.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 385 : 167 - 176
  • [6] Response of densely stocked loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) to applied nitrogen and phosphorus
    Bekele, A
    Hudnall, WH
    Tiarks, AE
    [J]. SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2003, 27 (03): : 180 - 189
  • [7] The effects of drought and disturbance on the growth and developmental instability of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Graham, John H.
    Duda, Jeffrey J.
    Brown, Michelle L.
    Kitchen, Stanley
    Emlen, John M.
    Malol, Jagadish
    Bankstahl, Elizabeth
    Krzysik, Anthony J.
    Balbach, Harold
    Freeman, D. Carl
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 20 : 143 - 150
  • [8] The role of the megagametophyte in maintaining loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedling arginase gene expression in vitro
    Christopher D. Todd
    David J. Gifford
    [J]. Planta, 2002, 215 : 110 - 118
  • [9] The role of the megagametophyte in maintaining loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedling arginase gene expression in vitro
    Todd, CD
    Gifford, DJ
    [J]. PLANTA, 2002, 215 (01) : 110 - 118
  • [10] Reference karyotype and cytomolecular map for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Islam-Faridi, M. Nurul
    Nelson, C. Dana
    Kubisiak, Thomas L.
    [J]. GENOME, 2007, 50 (02) : 241 - 251