Contact force facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line during pulmonary vein isolation

被引:11
|
作者
Schaeffer, Benjamin [1 ]
Willems, Stephan [1 ]
Meyer, Christian [1 ]
Lueker, Jakob [2 ]
Akbulak, Ruken O. [1 ]
Moser, Julia [1 ]
Jularic, Mario [1 ]
Eickholt, Christian [1 ]
Schwarzl, Jana M. [1 ]
Gunawardene, Melanie [1 ]
Kuklik, Pawel [1 ]
Sultan, Arian [2 ]
Hoffmann, Boris A. [3 ]
Steven, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg, Univ Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol Electrophysiol, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Cardiol Electrophysiol, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Mainz, Dept Cardiol Electrophysiol, Mainz, Germany
关键词
Ablation; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Contact force; Unexcitability; LEFT ATRIAL ABLATION; CATHETER ABLATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; PACE CAPTURE; SENSING TECHNOLOGY; FIBRILLATION; RECONNECTION; SYSTEM; PREDICTION; CONDUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-018-1228-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Contact force (CF) catheters provide catheter-tissue contact information to improve outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We evaluated different target-CF values for achievement of the additional endpoint of an unexcitable ablation line. Methods A total of 106 patients undergoing PVI were randomized into three groups (G) (G1: target-CF 15 g, G2: target-CF 10 g, G3: CF concealed from operator). The PVI encircling line was divided into predefined sections. Excitable tissue along the PVI-line identified by high output pacing (10 V, 2 ms) was targeted for further ablation. Results Mean average CF was 17.4 +/- 4.7 g (G1) vs. 12.3 +/- 6.0 g (G2) vs. 11.1 +/- 6.5 g (G 3) (p < 0.001). Primary unexcitable ablation lines were found in 38.6, 19.4 and 5.7% (G1, G2, G3 respectively; G1 vs. G2 p < 0.05, G1 vs. G3 p < 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns). Additional radiofrequency (RF)-energy to achieve unexcitability was lowest in G1 (3.6 +/- 3.1 kJ vs. 8.6 +/- 7.2 kJ (G2) and 10.4 +/- 6.7 (G3), p <= 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns) with accordingly lowest additional RF applications in G1 (3.0 +/- 2.6 vs. 7.0 +/- 5.4 in G2 and 8.4 +/- 4.0 in G3; G1 vs. G2 and G3, p < 0.001, G 2 vs. G 3 ns). Sections along ablation lines with low initial CF were most likely to reveal excitability. Single procedure success was 81.9 vs. 73.5 vs. 71.4% (G 1, 2 and 3, p = 0.6) during 437 +/- 254 day follow-up. Conclusion Higher tip-to-tissue CF during PVI facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line, requiring less additional RF-energy.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 641
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contact force facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line during pulmonary vein isolation
    Benjamin Schaeffer
    Stephan Willems
    Christian Meyer
    Jakob Lüker
    Ruken Ö. Akbulak
    Julia Moser
    Mario Jularic
    Christian Eickholt
    Jana M. Schwarzl
    Melanie Gunawardene
    Pawel Kuklik
    Arian Sultan
    Boris A. Hoffmann
    Daniel Steven
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2018, 107 : 632 - 641
  • [2] Residual gaps in the ablation line and requirement for carina ablation during contact force-guided radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation: determinants and prognostic implications
    Mulder, M. J.
    Kemme, M. J. B.
    Gotte, M. J. W.
    Hauer, H. A.
    Tahapary, G. J. M.
    Van Rossum, A. C.
    Allaart, C. P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 579 - 579
  • [3] Impact of Contact Force Visualization on Tissue to Catheter Contact Force During Pulmonary Vein Isolation
    Makimoto, Hisaki
    Lin, Tina
    Rillig, Andreas
    Metzner, Andreas
    Wissner, Erik
    Mathew, Shibu
    Deiss, Sebastian
    Rausch, Peter
    Kamioka, Masashi
    Bardyszewski, Alexander
    Lemes, Christine
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Ouyang, Feifan
    Tilz, Roland R.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [4] The incidence and location of epicardial connections in the era of contact force guided ablation for pulmonary vein isolation
    Sun, Xuerong
    Niu, Guodong
    Lin, Jinxuan
    Suo, Ni
    Guo, Tao
    Lu, Jiang
    Feng, Tianjie
    Zheng, Lihui
    Yao, Yan
    Zhang, Shu
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (09) : 2381 - 2390
  • [5] The contact force and continuity index parameters in pulmonary vein ablation
    Pietro, Turco
    EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (04): : 628 - 628
  • [6] The Use of Contact Force Data during Pulmonary Vein Isolation Translates into Improved Clinical Outcomes for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Patients
    Haldar, Shouvik
    Jarmin, Julian
    Panikker, Sandeep
    Jones, David
    Salukhe, Tushar
    Hussain, Wajid
    Markides, Vias
    Wong, Tom
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [7] Choice of Steerable Sheath Impacts Contact Force Stability During Pulmonary Vein Isolation
    Hiner, Evan
    Shah, Dipak
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 769 - 770
  • [8] DETERMINATION OF THE IDEAL CONTACT FORCE REQUIRED DURING PULMONARY VEIN ANTRUM ISOLATION (PVAI)
    Alipour, Pouria
    Khaykin, Yaariv
    Azizi, Zahra
    Pirbaglou, Meysam
    Conti, Sergio
    Ritvo, Paul
    Pantano, Alfredo
    Verma, Atul
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 402 - 402
  • [9] Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter
    Knecht, Sven
    Reichlin, Tobias
    Pavlovic, Nikola
    Schaer, Beat
    Osswald, Stefan
    Sticherling, Christian
    Kuehne, Michael
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 43 (03) : 297 - 306
  • [10] Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter
    Sven Knecht
    Tobias Reichlin
    Nikola Pavlovic
    Beat Schaer
    Stefan Osswald
    Christian Sticherling
    Michael Kühne
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2015, 43 : 297 - 306