Neuropsychological test using machine learning for cognitive impairment screening

被引:1
|
作者
Simfukwe, Chanda [1 ]
Kim, SangYun [2 ]
An, Seong Soo [3 ]
Youn, Young Chul [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Neurocognit Behav Ctr, Dept Neurol,Bundang Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Gachon Univ, Dept Bionano Technol, Seongnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Cognitive impairment; confusion matrix; dementia disease; machine learning; support vector machine; CLINICAL-RESEARCH CENTER; HOSPITAL-BASED REGISTRY; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; DEMENTIA; CONVERSION; VERSION; KOREA;
D O I
10.1080/23279095.2022.2078210
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Neuropsychological tests (NPTs) are widely used took to evaluate cognitive functioning. The interpretation of these tests can be time-consuming and requires a specialized clinician. For this reason, we trained machine learning models that detect normal controls (NC), cognitive impairment (CI), and dementia among subjects. Patients and methods: A total number of 14,927 subject datasets were collected from the formal neuropsychological assessments Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB) by well-qualified neuropsychologists. The dataset included 44 NPTs of SNSB, age, education level, and diagnosis of each participant. The dataset was preprocessed and classified according to three different classes NC, CI, and dementia. We trained machine-learning with a supervised machine learning classifier algorithm support vector machine (SVM) 30 times with classification from scikit-learn (https://scikit-learn.org/stablet) to distinguish the prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the models; NC vs. CI, NC vs. dementia, and NC vs. CI vs. dementia. Confusion matrixes were plotted using the testing dataset for each model. Results: The trained model's 30 times mean accuracies for predicting cognitive states were as follows; NC vs. CI model was 88.61 +/- 1.44%, NC vs. dementia model was 97.74 +/- 5.78%, and NC vs. CI vs. dementia model was 83.85 +/- 4.33%. NC vs. dementia showed the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 97.74 +/- 5.78, 97.99 +/- 5.78, and 96.08 +/- 4.33% in predicting dementia among subjects, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results, the SVM algorithm is more appropriate in training models on an imbalanced dataset for a good prediction accuracy compared to natural network and logistic regression algorithms. The NC vs. dementia machine-learning trained model with SVM based on NPTs SNSB dataset could assist neuropsychologists in classifying the cognitive function of subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 830
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuropsychological test selection for cognitive impairment classification: A machine learning approach
    Weakley, Alyssa
    Williams, Jennifer A.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe, Maureen
    Cook, Diane J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 37 (09) : 899 - 916
  • [2] Comparison of machine learning algorithms for predicting cognitive impairment using neuropsychological tests
    Simfukwe, Chanda
    An, Seong Soo A.
    Youn, Young Chul
    [J]. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2024,
  • [3] NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SCREENING TEST FOR COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE
    Petrova, N. S.
    Mehrabian, S.
    Raycheva, M. R.
    Traykov, L. D.
    [J]. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2015, 39 : 227 - 227
  • [4] Mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and cognitive dysfunction screening using machine learning
    Yim, Daehyuk
    Yeo, Tae Young
    Park, Moon Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (07)
  • [5] EVALUATION OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT USING A COMPUTERIZED NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST BATTERY
    LEVANDER, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 10 (03) : 327 - 327
  • [6] Malingering Detection of Cognitive Impairment With the b Test Is Boosted Using Machine Learning
    Pace, Giorgia
    Orru, Graziella
    Monaro, Merylin
    Gnoato, Francesca
    Vitaliani, Roberta
    Boone, Kyle B.
    Gemignani, Angelo
    Sartori, Giuseppe
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [7] Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
    Diniz, Breno Satler
    Nunes, Paula Villela
    Yassuda, Monica S.
    Pereira, Fernanda S.
    Flaks, Mariana K.
    Viola, Luciane F.
    Radanovic, Marcia
    Dutra de Abreu, Izabella
    Borelli, Danilo T.
    Gattaz, Wagner F.
    Forlenza, Orestes Vicente
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2008, 30 (04) : 316 - 321
  • [8] Screening for neuropsychological impairment using Reitan and Wolfson's preliminary neuropsychological test battery
    Horwitz, Julie E.
    Lynch, Julie K.
    McCaffrey, Robert J.
    Fisher, Jerid M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 23 (04) : 393 - 398
  • [9] Patterns of cognitive impairment in alcoholics on neuropsychological screening
    Zinn, S
    Edwards, CL
    Bosworth, HB
    Swartzwelder, HS
    Logue, PE
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 15 (02): : 283 - 283
  • [10] Machine learning assisted screening for cognitive impairment in the emergency department
    Yadgir, S. R.
    Engstrom, C.
    Jacobsohn, G. C.
    Green, R.
    Jones, C.
    Caprio, T. V.
    Kind, A.
    Shah, M.
    Patterson, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 : S284 - S284