Roadmapping technique for service management

被引:0
|
作者
Li, M
Kamekoa, A
Gao, F
机构
关键词
roadmapping; technology roadmap; knowledge creation; systems methodology; SOSM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Roadmap and roadmapping techniques, especially technology roadmapping, become increasingly popular in future planning for organizations. The major benefits from the approach are multiple participation, collective learning and "alive" process, through which, involved parties and persons can communicate, debate, negotiate and compromise on something for achieving a purposeful and worth-of-common-efforts goal. For the success of the approach in the activities involving multiple parties and stakeholders, proper methodologies, methods, tools, mechanisms are definitely needed. In this paper, we introduce general roadmapping techniques into service management, especially in the area of emerging service for the purpose of planning and management; at the same time, we bring a series of powerful approaches developed in systems science and knowledge management in the roadmapping process. The purpose of the latter approach is to deal with the potentially conflicting views on future plan due to different beliefs, values, and perspectives. It is not intended to blur the differences of diverse opinions; but it is seeking for exploring the appropriate system to critically and creatively leverages the varieties and brings forth new ideas that are absolutely indispensable for creating future roadmaps. The knowledge-creating perspective developed in JAIST is used in the roadmapping process for exploring the conversions of tacit knowledge, explicit knowledge and implicit knowledge between individuals and across groups, organizations and inter-organizations. Through SECI model and organizational knowledge spiral, as well as the cultivation of agreeable environments, roadmappers could choose to use "rich picture", "T-Plan" [8], "QFD", selected systems methods and other tools to create a roadmap and improve the quality of roadmap in those area involving multiple parties, with a diversity of perspectives, and full of complexity and changes.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 490
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technology roadmapping for a service organization
    Wells, R
    Phaal, R
    Farrukh, C
    Probert, D
    RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (02) : 46 - 51
  • [2] Service-Oriented Architecture Roadmapping
    Shan, Tony C.
    Hua, Winnie W.
    2009 IEEE CONGRESS ON SERVICES (SERVICES-1 2009), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 475 - +
  • [3] Roadmapping for Engineering and Technology Management
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    Meissner, Dirk
    Carayannis, Elias
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 51 : A1 - A2
  • [4] Roadmapping for engineering and technology management
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    Meissner, Dirk
    Carayannis, Elias
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 52 : 1 - 2
  • [5] Roadmapping the Service Transition: Insights for Technology Organizations
    Harmon, Robert R.
    Laird, Gregory L.
    PICMET '12: PROCEEDINGS - TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 3121 - 3130
  • [6] Roadmapping for improving cocoa postharvest management
    Sanchez Vargas, Adriana del Pilar
    Castellanos Dominguez, Oscar Fernando
    Dominguez Martinez, Karen Patricia
    INGENIERIA E INVESTIGACION, 2008, 28 (03): : 150 - 158
  • [7] The customisation framework for roadmapping product-service integration
    Youngjung Geum
    Sungjoo Lee
    Daekook Kang
    Yongtae Park
    Service Business, 2011, 5 : 213 - 236
  • [8] The customisation framework for roadmapping product-service integration
    Geum, Youngjung
    Lee, Sungjoo
    Kang, Daekook
    Park, Yongtae
    SERVICE BUSINESS, 2011, 5 (03) : 213 - 236
  • [9] Roadmapping for innovation management: evidence from Pirelli
    Amati, Guido
    Motta, Virna
    Vecchiato, Riccardo
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2020, 50 (04) : 462 - 477
  • [10] Technology Roadmapping as a New Tool of Knowledge Management
    Guo, Weidong
    2010 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2010, : 1658 - 1661