Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria

被引:18
|
作者
Triplette, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Donovan, Lucas M. [2 ,3 ]
Crothers, Kristina [2 ]
Madtes, David K. [1 ,2 ]
Au, David H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Clin Res Div, Seattle, WA 98103 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Vet Affairs Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
lung cancer; early detection of lung cancer; cancer prevention; tobacco abuse; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL-RECORD; SMOKING-CESSATION; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; CARE PROVIDERS; MORTALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; RECOMMENDATION; ATTITUDES; CT;
D O I
10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-239OC
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest computed tomography decreases mortality for high-risk current or former smokers. Lifetime smoking intensity (cigarette pack-years), an essential eligibility criterion, is poorly recorded in electronic health records, which may contribute to the overall low appropriate use of screening. Objectives: We sought to assess whether elements commonly extractable from electronic health records may be useful as prescreening tools to identify individuals for formal assessment of eligibility. Methods: This was a cross-sectional cohort study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) continuous survey, years 2011-2016. We included all adult participants with complete smoking interview data, weighted to construct a nationally representative cohort. We determined test characteristics for five criteria, including eligibility age, smoking status (current, former, or never), and current smoking intensity, to predict lung cancer screening eligibility as defined by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Results: Almost 9 million individuals (3.8% of the population) may qualify for screening. Simplified criteria, including the appropriate age range (55-77 yr) and smoking status, correctly discriminated individuals who were eligible for screening in most cases (area under the curve = 0.92). When the analysis was restricted to those of eligible age, smoking status retained fair predictive value (area under the curve = 0.85). Incorporating additional information about current smoking behavior would allow for refinement of approaches to identify specific populations for screening. Conclusions: These simplified criteria may be useful for identifying individuals who are eligible for lung cancer screening. Applying these criteria as a prescreening tool may improve appropriate referral and implementation of screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1285
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characteristics of lung cancer screening eligible population in the US and prediction of the eligibility with simplified criteria
    Okon, Marvin
    Williams, Joel
    Truong, Khoa
    Yu, Qingzhao
    Griffin, Sarah
    Zhang, Lu
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [2] Simplified Criteria for Predicting Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: A Potential Clinical and Research Tool
    Triplette, M.
    Donovan, L. M.
    Rise, P. J.
    Zeliadt, S. B.
    Madtes, D. K.
    Mularski, R. A.
    Lindenauer, P. K.
    Krishnan, J. A.
    Carson, S. S.
    McBurnie, M.
    Crothers, K. A.
    Au, D. H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [3] Optimising eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening
    Crosbie, Philip A. J.
    Callister, Matthew E. J.
    [J]. LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (08): : 665 - 666
  • [4] Selecting high-risk individuals for lung cancer screening; the use of risk prediction models vs. simplified eligibility criteria
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    Huesing, Anika
    Fortner, Renee T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (20)
  • [5] Estimation of the population at high risk of developing lung cancer in Chile using simplified eligibility criteria
    Argento, F.
    Bardach, A.
    Navarro, E.
    Gon, A.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 234 : 158 - 163
  • [6] Methods for Using Race and Ethnicity in Prediction Models for Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility
    Landy, Rebecca
    Gomez, Isabel
    Caverly, Tanner J.
    Kawamoto, Kensaku
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    Robbins, Hilary A.
    Young, Corey D.
    Chaturvedi, Anil K.
    Cheung, Li C.
    Katki, Hormuzd A.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (09) : e2331155
  • [7] Comparison Between the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Criteria and Other Lung Cancer Screening Criteria for Racial Disparity in Eligibility
    Pu, Chan Yeu
    Lusk, Christine M.
    Neslund-Dudas, Christine
    Gadgeel, Shirish
    Soubani, Ayman O.
    Schwartz, Ann G.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (03) : 374 - 382
  • [8] The Impact of Modified Screening Eligibility Criteria on Race and Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening
    Smeltzer, M.
    Liao, W.
    Faris, N.
    Fehnel, C.
    Lane, J.
    Williams, S. C.
    Ramos, R.
    Qureshi, T.
    Pacheco, A.
    Mukhopadhyay, A.
    Ray, M.
    Robbins, T.
    Wright, J.
    Osarogiagbon, R. U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (09) : S190 - S191
  • [9] Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data
    Anika Hüsing
    Rudolf Kaaks
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2020, 35 : 899 - 912
  • [10] Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data
    Huesing, Anika
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (10) : 899 - 912