Lessons from the use of a long-term energy model for consequential life cycle assessment: The BTL case

被引:46
|
作者
Menten, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Tchung-Ming, Stephane [1 ]
Lorne, Daphne [1 ]
Bouvart, Frederique [1 ]
机构
[1] IFP Energies Nouvelles, F-92852 Rueil Malmaison, France
[2] Arts & Metiers ParisTech, Esplanade Arts & Metiers, F-33405 Talence, France
来源
关键词
Consequential LCA; Prospective LCA; Life cycle assessment; Second generation biofuels; Advanced biofuels; TIMES model; System dynamics; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; LAND-USE; PART; SYSTEMS; EMISSIONS; BIOFUELS; CLIMATE; CARBON; LCA; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.072
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to develop a methodology adapted to the prospective environmental evaluation of actions in the energy sector. It describes how a bottom-up long-term energy model can be used in a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework. The proposed methodology is applied in a case study about the global warming impacts occurring as a consequence of the future production of synthetic diesel from biomass ("biomass to liquids"-BTL), a second-generation biofuel, in France. The results show a high sensitivity of the system-wide GHG balance to (i) the policy context and to (ii) the economic environment. Both influence the substitutions occurring within the system due to the production of BTL Under the specific conditions of this study, the consequences of introducing BTL are not clear-cut. Therefore, we focus on the lessons from the detailed analysis of the results more than in the precise-looking projections, illustrating how this type of models can be used for strategic planning (industry and policy makers). TIMES-type models allow a detailed description of the numerous technologies affected by BTL production and how these vary under different policy scenarios. Moreover, some recommendations are presented, which should contribute for a proper systematization of consequential and prospective LCA methodologies. We provide argumentation on how to define a functional unit and system boundaries that are better linked with the goal of the study. Other crucial methodological issues are also discussed: how to treat temporal aspects in such environmental evaluation and how to increase the consistency of prospective life cycle assessments. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 960
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment
    Yang, Yi
    Heijungs, Reinout
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (04): : 751 - 758
  • [2] On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment
    Yi Yang
    Reinout Heijungs
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 751 - 758
  • [3] Stochastic Technology Choice Model for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Bardow, Andre
    Suh, Sangwon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (23) : 12575 - 12583
  • [4] Long-term performance and life cycle assessment of energy piles in three different climatic conditions
    Sutman, Melis
    Speranza, Gianluca
    Ferrari, Alessio
    Larrey-Lassalle, Pyrene
    Laloui, Lyesse
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 146 : 1177 - 1191
  • [5] A dynamic life cycle assessment model for long-term carbon emissions prediction of buildings: A passive building as case study
    Su, Xing
    Huang, Yixiang
    Chen, Chaoyang
    Xu, Zehan
    Tian, Shaochen
    Peng, Li
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 96
  • [6] The consideration of long-term emissions from landfills within life-cycle assessment
    Laner, David
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2009, 27 (05) : 463 - 470
  • [7] Role of melanocortin in the long-term regulation of energy balance: Lessons from a seasonal model
    Schuhler, S
    Ebling, FJP
    [J]. PEPTIDES, 2006, 27 (02) : 301 - 309
  • [8] A Conceptual Review on Using Consequential Life Cycle Assessment Methodology for the Energy Sector
    Luu, Quyen Le
    Longo, Sonia
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Sanseverino, Eleonora Riva
    Cusenza, Maria Anna
    Franzitta, Vincenzo
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (12)
  • [9] Applying the Technology Choice Model in Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study in the Peruvian Agricultural Sector
    Larrea-Gallegos, Gustavo
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Wiener, Hugo
    Kahhat, Ramzy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 23 (03) : 601 - 614
  • [10] Life cycle sustainability assessment: Lessons learned from case studies
    Alejandrino, Clarisa
    Mercante, Irma
    Bovea, Maria D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 87