Replication Stress Response Links RAD52 to Protecting Common Fragile Sites

被引:14
|
作者
Wu, Xiaohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RAD52; FANCM; common fragile sites; replication stress; DNA double-strand breaks; homologous recombination; break-induced replication; BREAK-INDUCED REPLICATION; ONCOGENE-INDUCED SENESCENCE; DNA-DAMAGE RESPONSE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; PROTEIN-A; SYNTHETICALLY LETHAL; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; STRAND EXCHANGE; GENE CONVERSION; REPAIR;
D O I
10.3390/cancers11101467
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Rad52 in yeast is a key player in homologous recombination (HR), but mammalian RAD52 is dispensable for HR as shown by the lack of a strong HR phenotype in RAD52-deficient cells and in RAD52 knockout mice. RAD52 function in mammalian cells first emerged with the discovery of its important backup role to BRCA (breast cancer genes) in HR. Recent new evidence further demonstrates that RAD52 possesses multiple activities to cope with replication stress. For example, replication stress-induced DNA repair synthesis in mitosis (MiDAS) and oncogene overexpression-induced DNA replication are dependent on RAD52. RAD52 becomes essential in HR to repair DSBs containing secondary structures, which often arise at collapsed replication forks. RAD52 is also implicated in break-induced replication (BIR) and is found to inhibit excessive fork reversal at stalled replication forks. These various functions of RAD52 to deal with replication stress have been linked to the protection of genome stability at common fragile sites, which are often associated with the DNA breakpoints in cancer. Therefore, RAD52 has important recombination roles under special stress conditions in mammalian cells, and presents as a promising anti-cancer therapy target.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The concerted roles of FANCM and Rad52 in the protection of common fragile sites
    Hailong Wang
    Shibo Li
    Joshua Oaks
    Jianping Ren
    Lei Li
    Xiaohua Wu
    Nature Communications, 9
  • [2] The concerted roles of FANCM and Rad52 in the protection of common fragile sites
    Wang, Hailong
    Li, Shibo
    Oaks, Joshua
    Ren, Jianping
    Li, Lei
    Wu, Xiaohua
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [3] Distinct RAD51 associations with RAD52 and BCCIP in response to DNA damage and replication stress
    Wray, Justin
    Liu, Jingmei
    Nickoloff, Jac A.
    Shen, Zhiyuan
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 68 (08) : 2699 - 2707
  • [4] Distinct roles of RAD52 and POLQ in chromosomal break repair and replication stress response
    Kelso, Andrew A.
    Lopezcolorado, Felicia Wednesday
    Bhargava, Ragini
    Stark, Jeremy M.
    PLOS GENETICS, 2019, 15 (08):
  • [5] Common nonsense mutations in RAD52
    Bell, DW
    Wahrer, DCR
    Kang, DH
    MacMahon, MS
    FitzGerald, MG
    Ishioka, C
    Isselbacher, KJ
    Krainer, M
    Haber, DA
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1999, 59 (16) : 3883 - 3888
  • [6] RAD52 Facilitates Mitotic DNA Synthesis Following Replication Stress
    Bhowmick, Rahul
    Minocherhomji, Sheroy
    Hickson, Ian D.
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2016, 64 (06) : 1117 - 1126
  • [7] Post-Translational Methylation of Human RAD52 in Response to DNA Damage and Replication Stress
    Wray, J. W.
    Liu, J.
    Shaheen, M.
    Hromas, R.
    Nickoloff, J. A.
    Shen, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S147 - S148
  • [8] Physiological and Pathological Roles of RAD52 at DNA Replication Forks
    Malacaria, Eva
    Honda, Masayoshi
    Franchitto, Annapaola
    Spies, Maria
    Pichierri, Pietro
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [9] Human RAD52 interactions with replication protein A and the RAD51 presynaptic complex
    Ma, Chu Jian
    Kwon, Youngho
    Sung, Patrick
    Greene, Eric C.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 292 (28) : 11702 - 11713
  • [10] Accumulation of sumoylated Rad52 in checkpoint mutants perturbed in DNA replication
    Ohuchi, Takashi
    Seki, Masayuki
    Kugou, Kazuto
    Tada, Shusuke
    Ohta, Kunihiro
    Enomoto, Takemi
    DNA REPAIR, 2009, 8 (06) : 690 - 696