Question Mark Sign and Transvaginal Ultrasound Uterine Tenderness for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis A Prospective Validation

被引:26
|
作者
Zannoni, Letizia [1 ]
Ambrosio, Marco [1 ]
Raimondo, Diego [1 ]
Arena, Alessandro [1 ]
Del Forno, Simona [1 ]
Borghese, Giulia [1 ]
Paradisi, Roberto [1 ]
Seracchioli, Renato [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Gynecol & Human Reprod Pathophysiol, St Orsola Hosp, Massarenti 13, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
关键词
accuracy; adenomyosis; pelvic pain; question mark sign; transvaginal ultrasound; ultrasound; ELUSIVE ADENOMYOSIS; CONSENSUS OPINION; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; UTERUS; WOMEN; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; DEFINITIONS; SONOGRAPHY; TERMS;
D O I
10.1002/jum.15237
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the classic ultrasound (US) signs of adenomyosis, the question mark sign and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) uterine tenderness, in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Methods This was a prospective study including 78 patients waiting for hysterectomy for uterine benign diseases and undergoing preoperative US examinations to evaluate all criteria for US diagnosis of adenomyosis as reported by the consensus statement of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group. A US diagnosis of adenomyosis was made in the presence of 2 or more Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment features. Moreover, the question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness were evaluated. Ultrasound features were compared with the histologic examination, which was considered the reference standard for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. The Cohen kappa coefficient was used to measure the accordance between US and histologic results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of each US feature were calculated. Results The prevalence of adenomyosis in the sample was 33.3%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVUS in the diagnosis of adenomyosis were 77%, 96%, 91%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. Myometrial heterogeneity was the most frequently encountered feature (100%) but showed low specificity (7%). The question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 41%, 96%, 83%, 77%, and 69% and 69%, 65%, 66%, 81%, and 67%. Conclusions The question mark sign and TVUS uterine tenderness are useful tools for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1405 / 1412
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis
    Koçak, I
    Yanik, F
    Üstün, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1998, 62 (03) : 293 - 294
  • [2] Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review
    Dueholm, Margit
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 20 (04): : 569 - 582
  • [3] Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis
    Atzori, E
    Tronci, C
    Sionis, L
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1996, 42 (01) : 39 - 41
  • [4] Adenomyosis: Transvaginal Ultrasound and Imaging Innovations for Diagnosis
    Scott W. Young
    Nuria Luna Ramirez
    Rosanne M. Kho
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2023, 12 : 178 - 185
  • [5] Adenomyosis: Transvaginal Ultrasound and Imaging Innovations for Diagnosis
    Young, Scott W.
    Ramirez, Nuria Luna
    Kho, Rosanne M.
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 12 (03) : 178 - 185
  • [6] Importance of Transvaginal Elastography in the Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis
    Frank, M. L.
    Schaefer, S. D.
    Moellers, M.
    Falkenberg, M. K.
    Braun, J.
    Moellmann, U.
    Strube, F.
    Fruscalzo, A.
    Amler, S.
    Klockenbusch, W.
    Schmitz, R.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2016, 37 (04): : 369 - 374
  • [7] The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound and uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of adenomyosis
    ElKattan, Eman
    Omran, Eman
    Al Inany, Hisham
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2010, 15 (02) : 73 - 78
  • [8] TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSIS OF UTERINE MALFORMATIONS
    NASRI, MN
    SETCHELL, ME
    CHARD, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (11): : 1043 - 1045
  • [9] Uterine junctional zone and adenomyosis: comparison of MRI, transvaginal ultrasound and histology
    Harmsen, M. J.
    Trommelen, L. M.
    de Leeuw, R. A.
    Tellum, T.
    Juffermans, L. J. M.
    Griffioen, A. W.
    Thomassin-Naggara, I.
    Van den Bosch, T.
    Huirne, J. A. F.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (01) : 42 - 60
  • [10] Accuracy of findings in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis on ultrasound
    Medica Sam
    Monique Raubenheimer
    Florin Manolea
    Hector Aguilar
    Rishi P. Mathew
    Vimal H. Patel
    Gavin Low
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 842 - 850